Barely Significant

Excerpts

313,090 sentences

highly significantP = 1.93 × 10 −940.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We did not find a significant sex difference in overall PRS effects (OR male = 4.70 (4.16–5.31), OR female = 5.28 (4.80–5.80), P difference = 0.141, two-sample two-sided Z -test), even though the effect of sex was highly significant (OR = 2.54 (2.33–2.78), P = 1.93 × 10 −94 , one-sample two-sided Z -test).
highly significantP = 8.0 × 10 −930.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Two highly significant loci associated with idiopathic MN were discovered: the human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ alpha chain 1 ( HLA-DQA1 ) locus (rs 2187668; odds ratio, 4.32; P = 8.0 × 10 −93 ) and the PLA2R1 locus (rs 4664308; odds ratio, 2.28; P = 8.6 × 10 −29 ).
Hyperlipidemia in membranous nephropathy.
Clin Kidney J · 2026 · PMC12976208
highly significantp = 2.5e − 920.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ActiveDriver identifies N-terminal mutations in five cancer types as highly significant ( n = 73, FDR p = 2.5e − 92 from ActiveDriver; Fig. 2b ), confirming constitutive activation of CTNNB1 via disrupted phosphorylation as a prevalent driving mechanism of cancer.
highly significantP<3.1x10 -870.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing synchronized neurons with a fixed I-E delay of 5 ms, we observed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.99, P<3.1x10 -87 , Spearman Correlation, Fig. 4b ) between the excitatory input strength and the Rayleigh statistic, the criterion we used to measure the statistical significance of stimulus-synchronization.
highly significantp < 1 × 10 −840.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For viscosity–transparency relationships, ANOVA demonstrated a highly significant association (F = 244.94, p < 1 × 10 −84 , R 2 = 0.98), where viscosity nearly fully explained transparency differences—likely linked to enhanced molecular alignment or suppressed phase separation in high-viscosity systems—with a negligible C.V.
highly significantp = 8.7E-830.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The difference was highly significant (p = 8.7E-83, Fisher exact test; OR = 334 [146–864]; Table 2 ) with 79 out of 93 SFTs that were positive (85%) versus only 12 out of 752 STSs (1.6%), thus confirming the transcriptional data.
highly significantp = 9.39 × 10 −820.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When comparing IBD genes to non-IBD genes within each tissue group, we observed highly significant differences across all categories: brain tissues ( p = 9.39 × 10 −82 ), GIT tissues ( p = 2.65 × 10 −97 ), and other tissues ( p = 1.17 × 10 −90 ), indicating that IBD-associated genes have distinct expression profiles compared to background genes.