Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP << 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although there were no significant across population differences in mean observed heterozygosities (Ho) in both years (Friedman test: χ 2 0.05,5,17 = 5.662 , P = 0.340 for yr 1; yr 2 was similar), differences in allele composition and manner of pairing were evident from the highly significant genic and genotypic differentiation all P << 0.0001 .
a decreasing trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
The incidence rate showed a rapidly increasing trend from 1975 to 1987, with an APC of 3.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8–3.9%, P < 0.0001), while this increase slowed from 1988 to 2001 (APC = 0.8%, 95% CI = 0.4–1.1%, P < 0.0001), and was followed by a decreasing trend from 2002 to 2016 (APC= −0.7%, 95% CI= −0.9% to −0.5%, P < 0.0001).
highly significantP = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Both troponin T and CK-Mb reached highly significant values ( P = 0.0001) in the control group compared with the treated group at the 4 moments analyzed: 5 minutes after aortic declamping, and at subsequent 12, 24, and 48 hours. 32 Summarily, trimetazidine showed an improvement in several ischemic parameters, such as reduction in the frequency of angina pectoris attacks and myocardial damage during PCI and CABG.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a non-significant value of lack of fit found in the statistical analyses ( p > 0.05), and a highly significant level of performance of the model measured at the parameter level ( p < 0.0001), which indicates that the mode is capable of being accurately predicted by the variation of the parameters (Prajapati et al. 2021 ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The model was highly significant (F = 140.53, P < 0.0001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant (F = 3.62, P = 0.1228), indicating that the model adequately described the relationship between ultrasound parameters and VAP solubility.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When the analysis was performed according to the lesion size, a statistically significant difference was noted in the detection rate of DWI and T 2 -TSE for both types of metastatic lesions (lesions with size <10 mm and lesions with size >10 mm), and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for lesions <10 mm in which DWI detected 38 more lesions compared with T 2 -TSE.
highly significantp -value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
GradCAM which demonstrated that the sensitivity ( p -value < 0.0001 and p -value < 0.0001 respectively) was significantly different however specificity between HR-CAM and Zhou’s CAM did not vary ( p -value > 0.05) conversely between HR-CAM and GradCAM it was highly significant ( p -value < 0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Indeed, a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) diagnosis × location interaction (i.e., the closer to ThioS+ plaques from AD donors the higher the MAO-B area fraction versus no change in MAO-B area fraction with distance to sham plaques in CTRL donors) supports this interpretation.