We observed a highly significant (p < 0.0001) negative correlation between the frequency of these cells and the peripheral lymphocyte count as measured after 7 days of hospitalization ( Figure 3 E).
Excerpts
This difference was highly significant (χ 2 1 = 73.21, p < .0001).
We used automatic image analysis to count LMNA foci and found a highly significant difference between NTRK1-expressing and control cells ( p -value < 0.0001).
We observed a decreasing trend in clustering rate towards the end of 2020 after the onset of the COVID‐19 pandemic (fifth vs. third period: p <0.0001) (Figure 3 ).
The Ct values attained for the SARS-CoV-2 E gene using the AGPC method showed a highly significant correlation to those reported for the Cobas ® 6800 system (r = 0.97, p<0.0001) and the Maxwell ® instrument (r = 0.98, p<0.0001).
There was the highly significant difference in means of SpO 2 in Group A ( P < 0.0001) at 3.5 min (SpO 2 of 96.9%) from baseline when the nose was covered by rubber dam given by post-hoc analysis.
[ 54 ] compared 75 patients with cervical lesions (mostly squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) against 49 healthy volunteers, finding that the APT values of cervical cancer and normal cervical stroma showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001).
Starting the study with MSCs separated from the adipose tissue of the patients with non-healing wounds for autological transplantation, our attention was drawn by a highly significant negative correlation ( p < 0.0001) between the wound size and wound closure degree and by the high percentage (on average 75%) of CD34 + cells among the isolated cells [ 33 ].
The model was highly significant with a high R squared ( p < 0.0001, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.83).
Although absolute concentrations varied between the ELISA and ECL, the correlation coefficient for CSF A β 42 was r = 0.819 and highly significant ( P < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(b) ). 4.
The NS1 antigen test results were highly significant with a p value < 0.0001 ( χ 2 = 253.4, d f = 3), Figure 4 .
In addition to our crucial comparison of the two interference effects, the modulation of the load over the benefits observed for the valid condition was clearly significant, χ 2 (1) = 374.11, p < 0.0001; in fact, we observed (see Figure 7 ) a much larger modulation for the benefits (64 ms larger for high compared to low perceptual load), than for the costs (11 ms larger for high perceptual load).
Comparison of gingival scores Result obtained from repeated measure of ANOVA showed a highly significant decrease (F=11.981; P <0.0001) in mean gingival score from baseline to 8 th week in all the groups.
Comparing the titer of IgG directed against the RBD of the spike glycoprotein of the SARS-CoV-2 (anti-RBD IgG) measured with chemoluminescence assay and the neutralizing capacity of the serum, we observed a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) and strong ( r 2 = 0.67) positive correlation ( Figure 3 g).
There was a weakly significant negative correlation between knowledge and attitude (r = −0.21; P <0.0001) and a moderately significant positive correlation between attitude and practice (r = 0.50; P <0.0001).
Gram-negative enteric rods in periodontal pockets was highly significant and positively correlated with presence of A. actinomycetemcomitans (r=0.652, P <0.0001) and also both organisms were highly significant and positively correlated with PD, CAL, and BOP [ Table 2 ].
We found that induction of lac‐1 + had a highly significant effect on viability ( p < .0001), while the introduction of the construct from the earlier transformation did not have a significant effect ( P = .54).
When comparing melanoma recurrences in all patients before and after vaccination, there was a highly significant decrease in the number of longitudinal cumulative recurrent metastatic events ( p < 0.0001) after vaccination.
The statistical model for the soleus peak-to-peak amplitudes of the EMG responses to transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation revealed a highly significant fixed effect of spine alignment condition on the response size (F 2;98 = 47.879, p < 0.0001, ŋ p 2 = 0.494; Figure 3 B).
Single‐sample analysis The paired t ‐test analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) when comparing scores before and after the prosection activity.
Construct validity of the DFS-A Scale The exploratory factor analysis of the DFS-A scale showed a KMO measure of 0.92 indicating adequate sampling adequacy and a highly significant Bartlett’s Test of sphericity (χ 2 = 3205.10, df = 190, p value < 0.0001).
Palmitic acid (C16:0) exhibited a highly significant diet effect ( p = 0.0001), with the highest levels in SBM compared with both RRC and FRC.
The Kruskal–Wallis test demonstrated a highly significant difference in SUV mean across age groups in males (H = 25.46, p < 0.0001), with a trend in females (H = 8.52, p = 0.074).
The Mahalanobis distance obtained through pairwise comparisons among the group revealed highly significant differences (10,000 permutation rounds; P < 0.0001), ranging from 2.50 ( P. affinis and P. pseudornatus ) to 19.66 ( P. poecilus and P. obesus ).
Median emPHasis-10 scores were 3, 19, 31 and 40 in WHO functional classes I, II, III and IV, respectively, with highly significant differences between the scores in each functional class (all p<0.0001).