Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For the WAY 100635 experiment, a two-way ANOVA (age × treatment) showed highly significant differences among the ages ( F 1, 52 = 95.91, p < 0.0001), treatment ( F 3, 52 = 30.49, p < 0.0001), and age × treatment interaction ( F 3, 52 = 8.202, p = 0.0001; Fig. 4 a).
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
The Effects of Composite Probiotics on Inflammatory Response in Weaned Piglets and Pregnant Sows The serum test results showed that the IL–1ß, IL–6, and TNF–α level of group C2 pregnant sows was significantly higher than that of group T2, with an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.0001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01) ( Figure 1 A–C).
highly significantp < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Fig 1A shows that this pattern of massive difference occurred in the raw data at all three Ages, and the 95% confidence intervals make clear that the differences were highly significant (at all three Ages, p < .0001) with extremely large effect sizes (Cohen’s d = 2.7, 3.0 and 2.7 at the three Ages respectively).
a positive trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
5 a); isolating the impact of EIT-guided PEEP from potential confounders by excluding studies with recruitment maneuver before PEEP trials still showed a positive trend (MD = 3.85, 95% CI [1.95, 5.75], P < 0.0001, and I 2 = 0%), thereby reinforcing the direct impact of EIT-guided PEEP on lung compliance (Fig. 5 b); and removing studies with significant positive treatment effects revealed that the overall positive trend was not driven solely by a few outlier studies, as the impact on lung compliance remained consistently positive and statistically significant (MD = 2.86, 95% CI [0.95, 4.78], P = 0.003, and I 2 = 0%) (Fig. 5 c).
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
All the factors including glucose, peptone, and H 2 O 2 exhibited a clear quadratic effect, which was in good agreement with the extremely significant effects ( p < 0.0001) of quadratic terms as shown in Table 2 .
highly significantP value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The mean time to perform SAB was shorter in group-A with value 3.03 ± 0.72 min which is statistically highly significant having P value < 0.0001 when compared to group-B with value 7.73 ± 1.44 min.