Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ty} \oddsidemargin -1.0in \begin{document} \chi_{\left(1 \right)}^2 = \,\,\frac{{{{\left({532\,\, \times \,\,53\,\, - 13\,\, \times \,\,73} \right)}^2}\, \times \,\,671}}{{545\,\, \times \,\,126\,\, \times \,\,605\,\, \times \,\,66}} = 181.7 \end{document} The large chi-squared value evidenced a highly significant association between postoperative nausea and vomiting in surgical patients ( p < 0.0001), and the hypothesis of independence between the two symptoms was rejected.
Biostatistics: Facing the Interpretation of 2 × 2 Tables.
J Belg Soc Radiol · 2017 · PMC6251079
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation of VOE Score with Plasma Concentration of 12-HETE, TNF-alpha and IL-1β There was a strong and highly significant direct correlation between vaso-occlusive events score and plasma concentration of the pro-inflammatory molecule 12-HETE (r = 0.65, p < 0.0001), Table 3 .
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All quadratic terms were similarly highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with glycerol 2 (F = 197.9) being the strongest factor, followed by peptone 2 (F = 221.5) and pH 2 (F = 181), suggesting a curvilinear parameter–pyocyanin yield relationship in each case.
highly significantP = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Maxillary central incisors were the most commonly impacted teeth with a prevalence rate reported at 78.8%, while the results were found to be statistically highly significant when compared between maxillary and mandibular teeth ( P = 0.0001) [ Table 3 ].
highly significantP < .00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The time to first parasitemia is shown in a plot of the Kaplan Meier survival estimate in Fig 2 , indicating no significant difference between ARR and RRR groups by blood smear ( P = .46) and by PCR ( P = .41) in contrast to highly significant differences between ARR and RRR compared to infectivity controls ( P < .0001).
Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that the differences was significant between groups I and III in OS, and also had a tendency toward statistical significance in TTR (training cohort, OS, P < 0.0001 and TTR, P = 0.069; validation cohort, OS, P = 0.001 and TTR, P = 0.001) ( Table S5 ).