Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
More importantly, we found a highly significant effect of the workload manipulation on HR [ F (1, 18) = 36.1431, p < 0.0001, η 2 p = 0.667], with a higher HR for the more challenging 2-back task (mean = 80.4 ± 9.89) compared with the relatively easy 0-back task (mean = 77.27 ± 10.19).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
On comparison of Intrastromal TIL with the clinicopathological features, it was recognised that at the 95% Confidence Interval as shown in Table 2 - There was a significant association of age (p = 0.0147) with the intrastromal TIL count followed by a highly significant association found with the HRBC subtype (p < 0.0001), TNBC subtype (p < 0.0001) and HER2BC subtype (p = 0.0025).
highly significantp<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
He found that there was a highly significant positive correlation between EPDS scores on the two occasions (Spearman rank correlation r=0.59, p<0.0001). 13 Although studies performed in the immediate postnatal period are likely to pick up many cases of postnatal blues, Dennis and McQueen 14 found that mothers with an EPDS score >12 at 1 week postnatal were significantly more likely at 4 and/or 8 weeks to discontinue breastfeeding, be unsatisfied with their infant-feeding method, experience significant breastfeeding problems and report lower levels of breastfeeding self-efficacy.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlations and Interactions Between Variables IgM anti-MDA-LDL antibody levels correlated strongly with total serum IgM (rho = 0.78, p < 0.0001), and there was a weaker but still highly significant correlation for IgG anti-MDA-LDL with total serum IgG (rho = 0.36, p < 0.0001) ( Table 3 ).
showed a trendP<0.00010.0× alpha
On the other hand, the group of subjects who received PI vaccination showed a trend toward an increase in the median IgG titer (median values of 0.3 to 579 (P<0.0001), 0.00–401.4 (P = 0.3125), and 971.3 to 2163 (P = 0.3008) in group 1,2, and 3 respectively), except slight decrease of IgG value for Group 4 (median value of 1067 to 1021; P = 0.9717).
highly significantp -value < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
All H3K27Me3-, H3K36Me3-, H3K9Me3-, and H3K4Me2-nucleosome levels and the cfDNA concentration showed a weak, but statistically highly significant correlation coefficient with the percentage of MAF ( r = 0.33, 0.31, 0.32, and 0.21, respectively; p -value < 0.0001, and r = 0.28; p -value < 0.001, respectively) ( Figure 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Rat control on the farm A highly significant difference (χ 2 = 33.4543 p < 0.0001) was observed in the number of T. gondii positive animals among the properties that use cats for rat control (n = 239; 20 positive animals; prevalence 1.73%) and those that do not use them (n = 885; 12 positive 1 animals; prevalence 1.03%).