2a ), with a highly significant difference between TTS-patients and controls ( p < 0.0001).
Excerpts
Of note, a highly significant linear correlation between lipid droplets and granularity was observed ( Figure 6 B, p < 0.0001).
There is a highly significant difference between B10-injected and PBS-injected mice in two-way ANOVA (F = 50.32, P<0.0001).
Analysis of variance exhibited that effect of T2 (50 mM of KNO 3 ), T4 (150 mM of KNO 3 ) were highly significant ( P < 0.0001, and P < 0.001 respectively) on final seed germination (%) among all priming treatments.
An analysis of variance on the discrimination difference score as the dependent measure showed a decreasing trend across test sessions, F (3.73, 108.15) = 11.14, p < 0.0001, MSE = 225.72, which signifies further extinction within the Test phase.
There was a highly significant association for all species ( p < 0.0001) between the evaluation by CaV and SYBR/PI used as reference dye.
The highly significant slopes ( P < 0.0001) between the linear relationships ranged from 0.7 to 1.1, with the weakest relationships apparent for Q. robur (average slope of 0.8 for all methods), likely caused the relatively low amount of detect vessels and its variance between methods.
The overall effect was also quite significant (p<0.0001), which indicated that plasma Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio had the ability to be a biomarker for distinguishing people with PET (+) and PET (−) as well.
The regression model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), but the out-of-fit phase is not significant, with R 2 of 0.9741, indicating that the model fits well and can reasonably predict the taxanes yield within the ranges of the variables [ 33 ].
Figure 4 shows a bar graph of the average A , ε m a x , ε ∞ , τ r of the 4 cell lines and indicates the level of significance: where p > 0.05 is not significant (ns), 0.01 < p < 0.05 is significant (*), 0.001 < p < 0.01 is very significant (**), 0.0001 < p < 0.001 is extremely significant (***) and p < 0.0001 is extremely significant (****), raw values can be found in Table S1 .
The cut-off value was 3.8 ng/ml, and the difference between the groups was highly significant (p< 0.0001).
There was a highly significant increase (p < 0.0001) in both total and neutrophil leukocyte number associated with each stage of COPD, in accordance with the GOLD classification.
After 1 year of follow‐up, the overall prevalence of symptoms decreased to 49% among women and 33% among men, but the sex‐specific difference remained highly significant ( P <0.0001).
The KMO was 0.91, while Bartlett’s test for sphericity yielded extremely significant results (χ 2 = 13,958.572; p < 0.0001).
At a cut off of 10 mm (Table 2 b ) the odds of having a positive TST result in BCG-vaccinated was reduced but still highly significant (OR 4.8, 95% CI 2.3–9.6, p < 0.0001).
Despite highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) were noted for each property of fragments generated by two different fragmentation tools, the properties of MacFrag fragments are distributed in lower regions.
This improvement was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
A significant trend in the reduction of implantation of mechanical vs. biological prostheses was observed during the study period ( p < 0.0001).
Here, despite the sample size limitation, we observed consistent GO or disease enrichments using different web-based tools or different gene lists, indicating that the nominally significant findings ( P < 1 × 10 −4 ) and the coexpressed genes with GRIA4 are robustly related to the ND+MD trait.
Untreated cells (a) showed a highly significant difference (**** p < 0.0001) compared with all other groups.
There was a highly significant interaction between population and temperature 2 ( F 3,2126 = 15.34, P < 0.0001) indicating that the pattern of ticks questing with temperature varied between populations.
In addition, our results show that the S-pillar has a positive and highly significant (p-value < 0.01%) impact on ROA.
It is of note, however, that our results still demonstrate high mortality when the TLR3 −/− strain was infected by a high viral amount of IAV, although the difference between this group and wild-type animals is highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
controls, was markedly significant (respectively, 334 out of 402, or 83.1% vs . 18 out of 210, or 8.6%; p < 0001).
The effect of sex was highly significant in each cohort (P < 0.0001 in each cohort), with females more active than males ( Table 3 ).