While this makes logical sense, a closer look at table 2 and figure 3 shows that global longitudinal strain (GLS) has a highly significant correlation (r = 0.61, P = .0001).
Excerpts
Additionally, Cumulative Forest Plot showed a decreasing trend in the prevalence of Aeromonas infection in children with diarrhoea over time ( P = 0.0001).
The presence of an anatomical anomaly was a highly significant independent predictor of procedural failure/crossover (Odds Ratio [OR]: 8.16; 95% CI: 4.29 to 15.52; P < 0.0001).
The F value of the model was 22.79, demonstrating that the regression model was extremely significant because of p < 0.0001 [ 25 ]; namely, the probability caused by noise was very small.
This number is substantially less than the 1089 genes identified as belonging to the crp meta-regulon, and the discrepancy between observed and expected proportions is highly significant based on a binomial test ( p < 0.0001).
For SFTPA2, expression increased 5.13-fold in the severe group compared to the asymptomatic COVID-19-positive patient group and 50.02-fold compared to the mild group, both changes being highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Results Plasma 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA), the major metabolite of serotonin (5‐HT), was significantly higher in delirious and non‐delirious cognitively impaired subjects as compared to control individuals without delirium and cognitive impairment ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.007), which remained highly significant after excluding patients taking psychotropic medication ( p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003).
Highly significant genotypic variation ( p < 0.0001) was observed for all the phenotypic traits collected in Experiment 2 with heritabilities ranging from 0.67 to 0.86 ( Table 1 ).
When comparing the choice frequency in the two geometrically correct (C, R) versus the two geometrically incorrect corners (N, F) a highly significant difference was apparent (F(1,9) = 61.714 p<0.0001), revealing more choices for the two geometrically correct corners (C,R).
The level of education was found to be highly significant (p=.0001) with the kind of health services availed, like ANC registration, ultrasonography, Tetanus Toxoid, adopting balanced dietary pattern and use of iron and folic acid tablets.
According to the linear mixed-effects model, the covariance parameter estimates for residual variance were highly significant (Z = 4.415, p < 0.0001), indicating a good fit for individual variability.
Both differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001; p < 0.0001).
The intergroup difference was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
Fitting a generalized linear model with negative binomial errors to the data on number of thalli per individual from infected nests (fitted dispersion parameter θ = 4.39) showed a highly significant difference between nests in the level of infection (Wald χ 2 = 245.05, df = 1, p < 0.0001), and also a strong effect of estimated worker age (Wald χ 2 = 70.3, df = 4, p < 0.0001), with older workers having a higher load of thalli (Fig. 7 ), but no association with the presence or absence of P. alcon caterpillars (Wald χ 2 = 0.719, df = 1, p = 0.396).
The correlation between NEPSY raw scores (Response set) and BMT- i auditory attention results (“conflict” task) was highly significant [ r = 0.71 (0.53–0.84); p < 0.0001].
The seroprevalence rates in dogs increased linearly as the sampling area approached the sites of human cases, as confirmed by the highly significant Cochran-Armitage test for trends in proportions (p < 0.0001), which used a score of 1 for France, 2 for major towns, 3 for Mekambo, 4 for villages from the disease-epidemic area without human cases, and 5 for villages from the Ebola virus–epidemic area with human cases ( Figure 2B ).
Kaplan–Meier curves showed an extremely significant difference between the two groups in TCGA dataset (P < 0.0001, Fig. 7 I), and a consistent tendency was found in the GSE21050 dataset (P = 0.015, Fig. 7 J).
Critically, simple main effects confirmed that differences in atypicality between fluency and mastery portraits were highly significant for both phases, t1 ( M diff = 3.00), F (1, 11) = 214.08, p < .0001, p 2 = .951 and t2 ( M diff = 2.20), F (1, 11) = 36.46, p < .0001, p 2 = .768.
However, the overall increasing trend through time was highly significant ( t = 8.45, df = 471, p < 0.0001) with an effect size of 0.0024 developmental units per year.
Although this difference is highly significant (p<0.0001, t = 4.6345, df = 1355, SE = 0.058), the degree of the difference in linear dimensions is relatively small ( Fig 18 ).
From the perspective of metabolites, isoleucine and L-Leucine exhibited a highly significant positive correlation (P<0.0001), as well as a significant positive correlation with 4-Aminobutyric acid (P<0.01).
A two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of genotype across the three forebrain structures tested, F (1,31) = 55.97, P < 0.0001.
Results: A highly significant difference in mean times exists amongst the four planning methods ( P < 0.0001).
ANOVA results indicated a highly significant model, as demonstrated by an exceptionally high F-value of 644.09 and a low probability value (p-value < 0.0001), underscoring the reliability of the developed model (Table 5 ).
Plants that were excluded from pollinator visitation (−HP +CAGE) produced a mean of 0.45±0.15 SE seed/plant compared to plants open to pollinator visitation (−HP −CAGE) produced 2.37±0.35 SE seeds/plant, a highly significant difference ( t test, equal variance; t = 6.67, df = 172, p <0.0001).