Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP=0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The analysis of variance showed that Our results in children with neuroblastoma and ganglio- there were highly significant differences between the groups neuroblastoma mirrored those previously reported (Ishiguro (P=0.0001).
highly significantp = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The number of p53 + microglia in the hippocampus was also significantly increased in App NL‐G‐F mice, with two‐way ANOVA showing effects of genotype ( F (1,19) = 359.2, p = 0.0001), age ( F (2,19) = 434.1, p = 0.0001), and a highly significant interaction ( F (2,19) = 240.7, p = 0.0001).
an increasing trendP < 0.00010.0× alphagold
After adjustment for selected covariates, there was an increasing trend in the adjusted PRs for cancers of all sites by duration of diagnosed diabetes among men ( P < 0.0001 for linear trend) ( Fig. 1 A ) and women ( P < 0.0001 for linear trend) ( Fig. 1 B ).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Given the highly significant negative correlations between FAI FAT and %F in both sexes of the examined sample (males: r = − 0.5013; females: r = − 0.3564; p < 0.0001), we performed a regression analysis identifying body misperception for subjects with FAI FAT ≥ 2 or ≤ − 2 (Figs. 1 and 2 ) in accordance with previous studies [ 41 , 42 ] on the interpretation of perceived figure (Feel figure) and actual anthropometric values.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlations of SAGE and eSAGE to MoCA and MMSE are also highly significant. eSAGE comparisons to SAGE Spearman correlation of SAGE versus eSAGE was 0.882 ( p < 0.0001). eSAGE and SAGE are related by the formula: eSAGE score = –1.05 + 0.99 × SAGE score (Fig. 2 ).
highly significantP<0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The treatment effect was initially large, although after adding studies with large sample sizes, the confidence interval narrowed, and the treatment effect became smaller and stable, albeit the treatment effect was still highly significant (P<0.0001).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, a highly significant positive correlation was found between miR-424 and each of miR-199a, miR-183, and miR-224 (rho = 0.555, 0.364, and 0.359, respectively, p < 0.0001), and between miR-215 with miR-217 (0.529, p < 0.0001), in addition to the correlation between miR-199a and miR224 (rho = 0.515, p < 0.0001), and between miR-183 and miR-215 (rho = 0.361, p < 0.0001).