Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Table 8 shows that based on Model 2 instead of Model 1, 16.5% of those developing a CVD event would have moved up to the 'high risk' category of ≥20% while of those not having a CVD event 9.4% would have moved to this risk category, the difference of which is highly significant (p < 0.0001).
extremely significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
For plipastatins, this effect compared with that of the control without lipopeptide was statistically significant ( p = 0.0023, using the Dunn's multiple comparison test) for 300 mg.L −1 of the sample and extremely significant ( p < 0.0001) for the higher concentration (500 mg.L −1 ) of plipastatins.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The statistically highly significant differences observed compared to the positive control (Triton X-100, ~100% haemolysis, p < 0.0001) confirm that the observed effect was not non-specific but reflects the absence of an intrinsic haemolytic potential of the collagen material functionalised with P. nigrum extract (P3–P5, Figure 11 a).
highly significantp <.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In these additional analyses, the difference in GCV frequencies between WT and PARP−/− cells at the IgL locus remains highly significant ( p <.0001 and p = .0006, respectively), although the number of mutations scored at the less well defined IgH locus was not sufficient to reveal a significant difference in these more conservative analyses ( p = .1023 and p = .1280, respectively).
highly significantP = 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
rs202071893(A/G), AG heterozygous genotype had a highly significant association with HER2 + receptor ( P = 0.0001, OR = 3.021, and, RR = 2.170) compared to wild type AA showed a significant protective association ( P = 0.0141, OR = 0.246, and, RR = 0.3073) and mutant GG genotype showed non-significant association. rs367917640(G/C), CC showed a protective association (( P = 0.0031, OR = 0.09805, and, RR = 0.1281).