Median age of children presenting for all SA assessments was 10 years (IQR 4–14 years), for PAN was 3.5 years (highly significant, Mann-Whitney U test Z score=6.84, p<0.0001).
Excerpts
parasuis field isolates, a highly significant protection was conferred by the vaccination in the survival rate ( p < 0.0001), regardless of G. parasuis TbpB cluster and SV, since all non-immunized piglets died within the initial three days post-infection (dpi) (Table 2 ).
The highly significant ( p < 0.0001) genotype × year interaction also indicated the major influence of environment on the traits ( Supplementary Table S4 ).
The results confirmed that the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all catalysts and both dyes, 45 indicating that the selected variables strongly influenced degradation efficiency.
Genotype explained a highly significant ( P < 0.0001) proportion of the variation for every trait except plant lifespan ( Table 2 ).
Furthermore, Malat1 expression exhibited a 1.46-fold increase compared to the ODM group ( Figure 5 C), which was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The model provides a highly significant fit as compared to a null model (null −2LL = 7.7, final −2LL = 21.2, χ 2 = 26.9, p < .0001; Nagelkerke R 2 = .77; AIC = 23.5).
As presented in Table 2 and shown in Fig 2a , our results show a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) between fixation counts on items that were answered incorrectly (29.07±21.71) and and those that were solved correctly (17.16±13.89).
Conversely, TSH and Cys-C showed a highly significant positive correlation ( p < 0.0001; Figure 2 d).
Paired T-test analysis revealed extremely significant differences between the two groups in both diagnostic time and diagnostic costs ( P < 0.0001).
Repeated measures ANOVA showed that there was a highly significant interaction between acupuncture mode (verum vs. sham) and time (across all three treatment sessions) for rACC/MPFC Fisher Z values [F(2,27) = 13.403, p < 0.0001].
This difference is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
All the models were highly significant ( p < 0.0001), describing a high degree of correlation between the experimental and predicted values.
All quadratic terms were similarly highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with glycerol 2 (F = 197.9) being the strongest factor, followed by peptone 2 (F = 221.5) and pH 2 (F = 181), suggesting a curvilinear parameter–pyocyanin yield relationship in each case.
The model was highly significant (F = 117.22; p < 0.0001) and accounted for 82.4% of the variance in planned spending (R 2 = 0.824).
Regarding retention scores, a highly significant treatment effect was found (H [3] = 21.24, p<0.0001).
As expected, induction of the p21 gene in the population was highly significant for all the treatments (p<0.0001).
The influence of DSCC on the variation in milk components was always highly significant ( p < 0.0001), whereas it was not significant for milk yield and lactose.
The statistical analysis indicates highly significant results (p-value < 0.0001) for the uncontrolled cases.
Similarly, the proportion of converted cytosines in CpG dinucleotides in experimental versus control samples was highly significant (Fisher exact test: P = 0.0001).
Nominally significant MetaXcan results ( p < 10 −4 ) were investigated using gene set enrichment analysis. 2.8 Look‐Up of Results From Prior WL in COPD GWAS We compared significant results from our prior GWAS of WL in COPD [ 9 ] with results from the current analyses.
In both cases, the differences between the genotypes are highly significant (accelerated: P <0.0001; rocking: P <0.0001, two-way ANOVA).
it was statistically highly significant with a p-value of < 0.0001.
The correlation between the level of expression of gfp-tagged KIR2DL4 and the extent of sHLA-G loading was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001).
SRCV and VP demonstrated a highly significant upregulation for IFIT1 , MX1 , APOBEC3G and MX2 as compared to late but not early treated individuals ((SRCV: p < 0·0001, p < 0·0001, p < 0·0001, and p < 0·0001, respectively) and (VP: p < 0·0001, p < 0·0001, p = 0·006, p = 0·0002, respectively; Fig. 2 )).