Excerpts

Each WHtR cutoff was a highly significant predictor ( P < 0.0001) with the inclusion of constructs for race, smoking, age, and sex.

In contrast, MWL showed highly significant group differences at all time points (day 7: F (3,65) = 132.66; day 10: F (3,65) = 120.39; day 14: F (3,65) = 109.59; all P < 0.0001; Fig. 3a ).

Furthermore, the correlation between both methods was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), with Spearman’s r s = 0.9912 for honey, 0.9492 for hive debris, and 0.9682 for both sample types combined. 3.4.

subjects who ate no seafood, these differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with Hg levels that were higher 3–7-fold in maternal hair, 7–8-fold in maternal blood, 4–6-fold in the placenta, and >10-fold in cord blood.

Comparison of respiration rates at 5 to 35°C yielded also highly significant differences (two-tailed, unpaired t-test p<0.0001, DF = 23, t = 15.512).

A highly significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in Fn/c was observed between GFP-Vpr 1–96 (Fn/c ~2.4) and GFP-Vpr A6-2 (Fn/c ~0.9) indicating a reduction in nuclear accumulation.

A highly significant association was seen between PSA recurrence and elevated SPDEF expression (P<0.0001; Fig. 4A ).

Remarkably, we found a significant trend of reduced N expression from BA.2 to XBB.1.5 in mice of all three age groups, including weanling mice (−R = 0.79, p < 0.0001), adult mice (−R = 0.73, p < 0.0001), and aged mice (−R = 0.73, p < 0.0001) ( Fig. 6 d).

Age Dependency of Clinical Signs of SINS in Piglets SINS+LL and SINS−LL scores in 1 to 7-day-old piglets showed a highly significant correlation (r = 0.815; p < 0.0001) with the actual day of scoring and therefore with the age of the piglet.

Although the proportion of medication costs in outpatient medical costs immediately decreased 4.81 percentage points after the intervention, however it subsequently rose with an increasing trend of 0.28 percentage point per month ( p < 0.0001) (Table 2 ).

All cortical brain regions showed highly significant correlations irrespective of the early-phase FBB time frame or the particular reference region (p < 0.0001).

Notably, there was a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.0001) at concentrations of 400 μg/ml and above, reaching maximum viability reduction after 5 min of laser irradiation (Fig. 7 A–D).

Linear regression analysis revealed a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.2426, P < 0.0001).

Our analysis revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) decrease in both oocyte retrieval rates (Clark et al. 2021 ) and live birth rates (Baker et al. 2015 ) with increasing total FSH dose used during ovarian stimulation (Figure 1 ).

The difference between Swissprot and the ‘named’ group was again highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Results from the interrupted time-series model demonstrated a highly significant drop of $67 per year in OOP costs between 2012 and 2013 ( P <.0001) and continued annual decreases of $2.32 per year ( P =.042).

In line with the above data, the PA14 AmiE + strain displayed a very strong and highly significant decrease in cytotoxicity ( P < 0.0001) ( Fig. 5C ).

The model was highly significant (F = 140.53, P < 0.0001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant (F = 3.62, P = 0.1228), indicating that the model adequately described the relationship between ultrasound parameters and VAP solubility.

They observed highly significant association of seven COMT marker haplotypes with schizophrenia (CLUMP T4 P -value = 0.0001).

The across-years repeatability (Lessells and Boag 1987 ) of tarsus length is highly significant in both sexes (males: R = 0.78, females: 0.75, both P < 0.0001).

The model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the lack-of-fit term was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating a good fit and significant main effects.

Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of time ( F 37,962 = 34.6; p < 0.0001) on body mass variations (Fig. 1 a).

The GWAS analysis revealed a total of 80 highly significant Bonferroni corrected SNPs ( p < 0.0001 (−log10 ( p ) = 9.45) located on eight autosomes ( Table S1 ).

While there was no difference in baseline compliance among the two groups (14.58% compared to 12.43%), there was a significant difference when measured at follow-up (32.03% compared to 23.05%) and the magnitude of improvement (17.45% versus 10.62%) was also highly significant ( P <0.0001).

The stepwise backward logistic regression procedure revealed a highly significant model (model χ 2 = 720, 25 df, p < 0.0001) with the factor COUNTRY as the most significant factor (Table 3 ).