For all regions and models, the correlations between regional SWI values were highly significant ( p < .0001).
Excerpts
Tests for linear trend between perceived smoke exposure categories and CO were highly significant (p < 0.0001).
This revealed a highly significant correlation with R 2 = 0.42 and P < 0.0001 (Figure 3c ).
The difference among subgroups was highly significant ( F ratio 214, P < .0001).
The difference was also highly significant between CD patients on GFD and those with active disease ( p < 0.0001).
The Gompertz curve fitted to the entire data set was highly significant ( F = 5127.5, P > 0.0001, df = 2, 107) and accounted for 99% of the total variation in the data ( Table 2 ).
Association between search activities of CKD, dialysis, kidney failure, and kidney transplant Globally, linear regression analysis indicated an increasing trend in monthly search activity for CKD ( y = 0.299 x + 13.29, R 2 = 0.937, p < .0001), dialysis ( y = 0.114 x + 59.38, R 2 = 0.548, p < .0001), kidney failure ( y = 0.128 x + 53.40, R 2 = 0.728, p < .0001), and kidney transplant ( y = 0.080 x + 39.35, R 2 = 0.262, p < .0001) ( Figure 2(A) ).
The effect of ridge orientation was highly significant (χ 1 = 17.5, P < 0.0001), which confirmed our findings in experiment 1.
Moreover, the effect of anticoagulation became more pronounced when we analyzed single miRNA ∆Cq levels over time ( Figure 3 B), resulting in a highly significant ( p < 0.0001) difference between CTAD and EDTA plasma for the miRNAs miR-191-5p, miR-320a, miR-126-3p, and miR-21-5p.
A highly significant effect of both Time and Group factors on SCC was also observed over the trial ( P < 0.0001).
The model outputted a distribution of values with highly significant difference in their means (p < .0001) ( Fig 5 ).
Daily meal preparation frequency showed a significant trend towards a healthier dietary profile for ECI scores ( p < 0.0001) and DINE-fibre score when cooking on more than just one occasion per day ( p < 0.0001).
The Q-test for heterogeneity was highly significant (P<0.0001).
Analysis by R, fitting a GLM with a quasibinomial error structure, confirmed the highly significant main effects of age (change in deviance = 84.45, P < 0.0001, for 6 df) and region (change in deviance = 27.03, P < 0.0001, for 3 df), and the 2-way interaction between age and region (change in deviance = 34.85, P = 0.01, for 18 df, residual degrees of freedom = 1615).
A two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of genotype across the three forebrain structures tested, F (1,31) = 55.97, P < 0.0001.
Changes in semen parameters There was a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.0001) in mean sperm count in animals treated with HAART (0.74 ± 0.30 × 10 6 /mL), HAART + VCO (0.93 ± 0.34 × 10 6 /mL) and VCO (1.86 ± 0.54 × 10 6 /mL) respectively when compared with control (5.67 ± 0.26 × 10 6 /mL).
Acetic acid A highly significant effect was observed due to species (3wAN: F 1,4,2,22 = 9.9, p < 0.0001), with little to no effect on U. intestinalis and the largest effect seen in P. palmata .
This difference was highly significant in a multivariate linear regression model, p < 0.0001.
There were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) linear correlations (as high as r = 0.962 between ABTS and DPPH) between variables of antioxidant potential ( Table 4 ). 3.
Age was highly significant for all evaluated morphometric traits ( p < 0.0001; Table 1 ; Fig. 2 ).
nose position in HC and TC (Figures 3C,D ) indicated highly significant body posture differences (slope differences: U = 143; P < 0.0001) in shocked vs. non-shocked mice in the first 15 min after reopening the door (Figure 3E ).
The ANOVA results of the regression model demonstrated that the model is highly significant ( p < 0.0001), and the lack-of-fit value ( p = 0.7403) showed that the model fit well in the experimental design.
The model was highly significant (Chi-Square = 264.87 (12), p < 0001) and accurately placed 81.6% of the sample into their respective group (Actives versus Withdrawals).
WC and BMI stand out with the highest diagnostic performance, having AUC values of 0.967 and 0.941, respectively, both highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The difference between type 1/type 1-like and the other two groups was highly significant ( P <0.0001).