Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp=0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, we did find a highly significant increase in the rare/common CNV ratio in the LFS patients carrying mutations in the TP53 DBD when compared to both controls (p=0.0002) and to patients carrying the p.R337H mutation (p=0.0156; Fisher-exact test) (Figure 1B ).
Number of rare germline CNVs and TP53 mutation types.
Orphanet J Rare Dis · 2012 · PMC3558401
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Applying repeated measures of variance methodology, a highly significant difference could be seen (F(1, 204) = 14.3; p = 0.0002) ( Figure 2 ), where those on active treatment exhibited higher e-GFR as a result of the treatment.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This meta-analysis failed to show any benefits of adjuvant bisphosphonates in premenopausal women, but highly significant improvements in bone recurrence (RR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.60–0.86, 2 p = 0.0002) and breast cancer mortality (RR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.93, 2 p = 0.002) were seen in the 11,767 postmenopausal women included in the meta-analysis.
Bone-Targeted Agents and Metastasis Prevention.
Cancers (Basel) · 2022 · PMC9367604
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing the mRNA levels of tissue samples obtained from the dorsal horn of control animals and from the dorsal horn of CFA-injected animals ipsilateral to the CFA injection at post-injection day 3 (at the peak of mechanical allodynia), we observed a highly significant, approximately six times increase in the IL-1R1 mRNA ( p = 0.0002) in the experimental animals (Table 2 ).
highly significantP < 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, a statistically significant ( P < 0.004) interaction between the organ sampling-time and the SNP treatment was revealed in kidney regardless of the dosing time, whereas a highly significant ( P < 0.0002) interaction was validated in liver only in animals injected at 13 HALO. pmc-status-qastatus 0 pmc-status-live yes pmc-status-embargo no pmc-status-released yes pmc-prop-open-access yes pmc-prop-olf no pmc-prop-manuscript no pmc-prop-legally-suppressed no pmc-prop-has-pdf yes pmc-prop-has-supplement no pmc-prop-pdf-only no pmc-prop-suppress-copyright no pmc-prop-is-real-version no pmc-prop-is-scanned-article no pmc-prop-preprint no pmc-prop-in-epmc yes pmc-license-ref CC BY 1.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For risk groups, a highly significant (likelihood ratio test p = 0.0002) Cox proportional-hazards model included statistically significant covariates age (HR 1.1 (1.0 − 1.2) p = 0.004), stage IV (HR 173.8 (9.1 − 3325.5) p = 0.0006), and invasive ductal (ICD-0-3 code 8500/3) histologic type (HR 0.06 (0.006 − 0.68) p = 0.023).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Quantitative analysis of RT-qPCR data revealed that, in breast cancer (BC) samples relative to control samples, PGR exhibited a 0.649-fold expression change with a non-significant difference (p = 0.0599); CD14 showed a 0.459-fold reduction with a highly significant difference (p = 0.0002); PPARG displayed a 0.480-fold downregulation with a significant difference (p = 0.0012); CHRM1 presented a 0.515-fold decrease with a significant difference (p = 0.0034); and HTR3A had a negligible 1.026-fold expression alteration with no statistical significance (p = 0.1223).