Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp =<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Biodex Postural Stability System The group × time interaction was found to be highly significant for PST-API ( F =15.4, 1 54 p =<0.001, η p 2 =0.21) and PST-MLI ( F =4.35, 1 54 p =0.04, η p 2 =0.07) indicating that the multifactorial intervention had a differential effect on anterior-posterior and mediolateral stability over time.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The Pearson's correlation between allelic frequencies obtained using both methods in the LiTOX strain was highly significant ( P < 0.001, r = 0.85), validating the reliability of our mRNA tag sequencing pooled data for inferring population allelic frequencies.
highly significantP =0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Though it is associated with all three finger patterns, branched lip print associated with arch finger print is highly significant ( P =0.001) followed by loop finger print pattern ( P =0.005) and whorl finger print pattern ( P =0.006).
Patterns - "A crime solver".
J Forensic Dent Sci · 2011 · PMC3190437
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Carbachol delivery to PFC during sevoflurane anesthesia produced a highly significant increase in the local acetylcholine levels [mean ± SD (CI): 1.57 ± 0.92 (0.66–2.47), p < 0.001 compared with sevoflurane anesthesia], which remained significantly elevated during post-sevoflurane recovery period [mean ± SD (CI): 1.13 ± 0.87 (0.29–1.99), p = 0.007 compared with sevoflurane].
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
No significant difference was detected between the effective MNP coverage and anaemia prevalence ( Figure 1 A), but the differences between deworming and anaemia prevalence and between the MNP + Deworming condition and anaemia prevalence ( Figure 1 B,C) were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was also a significant statistical difference between study groups as regards AST and ALT ( p < 0.052 and p < 0.027, respectively), in addition to a highly significant statistical difference among study groups as regards vitamin D levels ( p < 0.001), where a significant decline in mean vitamin D levels was noticed in ICU patients compared to ward patients (18.3 ± 4.8 vs 23.1 ± 3.9) (Table 2 ).
showed a trendp < 0.0010.0× alpha
If using tripartite SCCAg grouping [96 cases in Tertile 1 (0.29–0.67), 89 cases in Tertile 2 (0.68–0.99), and 108 cases in Tertile 3 (1.00–11.50)], the relationship between different levels of SCCAg and EGFR mutation probability showed a trend of first flattening and then decreasing [70.8% (68/96), 68.5% (61/89), and 45.4% (49/108), p < 0.001]; after fully adjusted for covariates, the probability of EGFR mutation was 70.8% (95% CI: 52.9%–84.0%), 74.5% (95% CI: 56.6%–86.8%) and 55.1% (95% CI: 35.4%–73.2%) with the increase of SCCAg level