The results were highly significant (p=0.001) ( Table 1 ; Figure 1 ).
Excerpts
In terms of the relation between the total level of anxiety according to STA-Y and TAI-Y classifications and demographic characteristics among the studied students, the study’s findings indicate there is a highly significant correlation with university entrance score and the combination of working and studying (P≤0.001).
Growth performance exhibits highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among treatments ( Table 3 ).
Child-related characteristics, including sex and age, were highly significant ( p < 0.001), with a higher burden observed among male children (56.3%) and those aged 0–23 months (50%).
The ex vivo epithelial cell adhesion assay results indicated a highly significant reduction in bacterial adhesion to T24 cells compared to placebo (p < 0.001) following the consumption of cranberry dosages containing 36 or 72 mg of PAC (Table 1 , Figure 1 ).
In addition, the results of that study indicated that the estimated VO2max was a moderately significant predictor of Astrand submaximal VO2max (r = 0.688, p < 0.001).
These effects were highly significant [repeated measures ANOVA with call type as a within-subjects variable; for drug effect F (1,89) = 116.57, p < 0.001; for call type F (4,189) = 0.65, p = 0.63; for drug × call interaction, F (4,189) = 0.26, p = 0.90].
Notably, the Ido1‐KO group exhibited a marked trend towards restored p‐4EBP1 ( p < 0.001) and p‐P70S6K ( p < 0.001) levels, suggesting that Ido1 KO helped maintain anabolic signalling pathways under tumour burden (Figure 3A–D ).
Effect of Observation Period There was a highly significant effect of time on patient outcomes (Wilks’ lambda = 0.690, F (2,116) = 26.018, p < 0.001).
MMEx at 200 mg.kg −1 achieved a highly significant ( p < 0.001) inhibition of BSA denaturation of (58.27 ± 0.19%) in a dose-dependent manner.
In contrast, nationality demonstrated a highly significant association with biologic allocation (χ2 test, p < 0.001; Monte Carlo, p < 0.001), as did recoded ethnicity (χ2 test, p < 0.001; Monte Carlo, p < 0.001).
The analysis (Pillai’s Trace) revealed that the multivariate interaction Time × Group was highly significant with a very large effect size [F(1.137) = 8.159, p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.48], indicating an overall effect of treatment on the set of dependent variables.
In the case of NSCLC, the field of imageology revealed a highly significant marker (the highest AUC value was 0.83, P < 0.001), and a similar trend was observed in melanoma lymph nodes (AUC value = 0.64; P = 0.001).
Also, the correlations with the total scale were strong and highly significant, ranging from 0.898 for the “friends” subscale to 0.921 for the “significant other subscale” (all p -values < 0.001).
All these levels of variation were highly significant ( P < 0.001).
All terms which are a function of age of the participant in all the models were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
At 9 months, highly significant differences were observed ( p < 0.001) with minimum PAR for group I (mean 133.5 ± 22.6) and maximum for group III (mean 165.8 ± 17.6) ( Fig. 2 ).
Semi-quantitative analysis ( Figure 9 ) confirmed these histological findings, as one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference among the experimental groups (F (3,20) = 59.33, p < 0.001).
They also confirmed a strong trend toward higher S-100 levels at 24 hours post-admission for those patients with poor neurologic outcomes who underwent MTH ( P = 0.001).
At least two abortions increased the risk 76% and “at least at three” IAs increased the risk 89% (both results were highly significant, P < 0.001) ( Huang et al. 2013 ). • India (2008)—Indian researchers reported that the mean number of abortions among cases of breast cancer was nearly twice that reported in controls (1.02 v. 0.52, t = 2.35, P < .05) ( Rai et al. 2008 ).
On the other hand, a subgroup analysis including those patients who had available determinations of hs-TnI and NT-proBNP during the study period, showed a moderate but highly significant positive correlation between both biomarker concentrations (correlation coefficient 0.591, p < 0.001, supplementary Fig. 2 ).
A one-way MANOVA on all the social capital and health-related variables with study group (MCL, comparison) as independent variables proved to be highly significant (F [6, 1060] = 40.28, Wilk’s Lambda = 0.81, p < 0.001).
Highly significant two-way interaction effects between the length of the masking interval and the ball acceleration accounted for this response pattern (TE: F (4, 40) = 30.7, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 18.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 2; PE: F (4, 40) = 20.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 28.1, p<0.001 for Experiment 2).
There were also highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001) interactions between genotype and environment, and genotype and temperature for both traits (Table 3 ).
In the left hand columns of Table 3 representing the results for squeals, vocants, and growls the odds ratios show that the three protophones conformed to the first two predictions (protophones > cry in neutrality, protophones < cry in negativity) with highly significant odds ratios (ORs > 1 and p < 0.001).