Excerpts

The model created was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The differences between scLMS and dLMS in the risk of metastasis were highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas the difference in overall survival were less substantial ( p = 0.02), suggesting that the patients could be dying of unrelated causes.

A highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in sepsis was revealed across the calendar periods with an almost 5-fold increase in 2014–2017 (RR 4.69 95% CI 3.69–5.96).

There was a highly significant correlation between the extent of CAD and low HDL-C ( P < 0.001), [ Table 2 ], old age ( P = 0.003) and male sex ( P = 0.02) [ Table 3 ]. 21 (7.1%) patients were asymptomatic, 110 (37.3%) had stable angina, 127 (43.1%) had NSTE-ACS, 20 (6.8%) STEMI and 17 (5.7%) had HF.

ANOVA showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect of temperature stress and combined temperature-drought stress on all measured characteristics.

Prerequisite For the pretest data, we could confirm the existence of a highly significant Posner effect ( t (35) = 5.51, p <.001, d = 0.92), resulting in faster RTs for spatially congruent ( M = 453.19 ms, SD = 105.24) than for incongruent trials ( M = 475.56 ms, SD = 106.54), see Fig. 3 .

The highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) suggests differential T cell clonality and immune recognition capacity between prognostic groups.

In addition, moderation by parity approached significance for the relationship between the diagnoses of NCI compared to MCI for performance on the WMS Delay task ( F (7,340) = 23.831, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.329, adjusted R 2 = 0.315; Fig. 1c ), such that MCI females with higher parity had reduced performed compared to MCI females with lower parity (β = −0.176, p = 0.067, sr 2 = 0.007), and this was not the case in NCI females (β = −0.080, p = 0.349, sr 2 = 0.002).

36 Breast tumors exhibited statistically significantly elevated mRNA expression of PADI2 compared with normal breast tissues with an increasing trend from Luminal A/B, HR-/HER2-enriched to TNBC tumors (Dunn’s multiple comparison test, two-sided p<0.001; figure 1C ).

The multivariate models for SAC and PSC were highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to those of WRA and men ( p = 0.04, p = 0.01).

For both ABZ and MLS treated worms, the duration required for paralysis and death was recorded to exhibit a dose-dependent and highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) when compared to the control group.

Latent g explained a highly significant portion of variance ( p < 0.001).

There was no difference in operative stay/TBSA% between the TBSA% groups (p = 0.64), but there was a highly significant difference in total stay/TBSA% between the TBSA% groups (p<0.001).

Using within-subject paired t-test comparisons, compared to pain pre-VR, patients reported a highly significant 26% decrease in mean NRS scores during VR meditation (pain pre-VR = 6.71 + − 1.65 vs. pain after VR = 4.96 + − 2.01) [ p < 0.001].

officinale extracts was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all three concentrations of both and at each of the various application times. 4.

However, there was a highly significant statistical difference on comparing ETT size estimated by height-based formula with age-based formula ( P < 0.001) as well as on comparing ETT size estimated by height-based formula and USG ( P < 0.001) [ Table 3 ].

However, there was a significant trend in which the gap in AUROC values between the stacking ML model and MEWS increased gradually ( P < 0.001).

The IPSS was significantly lower in the intervention group (5.16 ± 1.08) compared to the control group (8.39 ± 1.12), with a highly significant statistical difference ( t = 19.509, P < 0.001).

A GLM with a quasibinomial error distribution revealed a highly significant interaction between cage type and depth ( χ 2 = 278.85, df = 1, p < 0.001).

From this, all of the same general sampling locations were clustered between the Arctic and temperate locations, with a diversity gradient flowing from soil to inlet to lake and outlet and highly significant differences between both sources (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001) and general sampling locations (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001).

Highly significant differences were observed for all quadratic terms of the three factors ( p < 0.001), suggesting the existence of obvious nonlinear relationships.

Many correlations were strong ( r > .60) and highly significant ( p < .001), exemplified by A3’s strong positive associations with B2 ( r = .714, p < .001), D1 ( r = .716, p < .001), and D3 ( r = .706, p < .001).

The GROUP×ARRAY SIZE interaction (F (2,90) = 2.92, p = 0.06) was marginally significant, and the main effect of ARRAY SIZE (F (2,90) = 120.23, p <0.001) and GROUP (F[ (1], [45) ] = 5.64, p = 0.02) was significant.

Upon comparing flap sizes and lengths of partial distal necrotic and uneventfully healed flaps a significant trend in flap size (261 ± 33.8 cm 2 vs 186 ± 61.7 cm 2 ; 95% CI: −103.5 to – 59.8: p = 0.001) and flap length (29 ± 5.1 cm vs 24 ± 3.8 cm, 95% CI: −9.3 to −3.4; p = 0.003) was seen.

Internode length was the most strongly differentiated trait, showing highly significant differences at both canopy strata (p < 0.001 for middle and lower internodes; Supplementary Table 2 ), and ordering across strata.