Furthermore, the overall contributions (main and interaction effect) of both "jacked up" and "barriers to health or harm reduction services" to the final model were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for both variables).
Excerpts
At the time of RPM, the level of ER visits increased by 14.58 (95% CI 10.70-18.46) visits per month per 1000 beneficiaries and had a decreasing trend with 0.26 (95% CI −0.32 to −0.20) fewer visits per month per 1000 people ( P <.001 for all outcomes) in the treatment compared with the control.
Results: Mean stain absorption was the highest with nanofilled composite resin (Filtek Z350 XT,3M ESPE) after exposure with light-curing intensity of 325–425 mW/cm 2 and least with microhybrid composite resin (Filtek Z100, 3M ESPE) after exposure with light-curing intensity of 750–850 mW/cm 2 and this difference found was highly significant statistically ( P < 0.001).
The magnitudes of effects for these respondents who believe that an HIV-positive teacher should continue teaching attenuated by 10% and further 5% with the introduction of demographic and socioeconomic measures respectively, turning the previously highly significant estimate (OR=1.46, p≤0.001) into significant (OR=1.31, p≤0.05) and marginally significant (OR=1.24, p≤0.10) when comparing the coefficients in Model 1 to Model 2 and Model 2 to Model 3.
Attitude had a strong and highly significant effect on purchase intention (H4: β = 0.736, t = 20.679, p < 0.001), explaining 54.1% of the variance in purchase intention (R 2 = 0.541). 5.
The association between overall mortality and increasing age remained highly significant when adjusted for underlying co-morbidities or immunosuppression (p = 0.001).
There was a highly significant difference between the quotient of the TBI and CVF group ( p < 0.001).
The strength of the correlation between global self-esteem and personal burnout was weak, but it was highly significant ( r = –0.26; p < 0.001).
When uniquely genotype C patients were taken into account, a higher proportion of mutations, reaching a highly significant statistical difference (p<0.001), was found among patients with disease progression to LC and HCC (Group 3).
Likewise, the creatinine rate level did not change (0.10 per 100 visits per months, p = 0.71), but there was an increasing trend during the period (slope change = 0.23 per 100 visits per month, p < 0.001). 3.3.
Statistical analysis of change in alveolar height with time was done by one way ANOVA test [ Table 3b ] and was found to be very highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Analysing the two sampling intervals separately showed a highly significant relationship of detected numbers of pesticides and agricultural production area in May ( p < 0.001) but not in August (SOM Table A8 ).
Change in PANSS total score was − 14.7 ± 23.0 points (−3.6 ± 7.4 on the positive and −5.1 ± 6.8 on the negative subscale); again, change from baseline to endpoint was highly significant (p < 0.001) for each score.
It was extremely significant ( p < 0.001) in PD1–PD11 and ( p < 0.01) and was not significant in PD15–PD21 when compared to control.
All the hematologic and inflammatory parameters showed an increasing trend from Group I to Group IV ( P < 0.001); in contrast, Hb and lymphocyte fraction tended to decrease (Table 2 ).
In all the cases the differences among groups were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05, and statistically highly significant when p < 0.001.
Random effects were highly significant in each of the 3 models (H: LR χ 2 = 1,264, df = 1, P < 0.001; S: LR χ 2 = 177.21, df = 1, P < 0.001, V: LR χ 2 = 248.9, df = 1, P < 0.001), suggesting that a large portion of the variance unexplained by sex, portion, and size (i.e., the fixed effects) depended on some unconsidered features of the individuals, especially for the hue.
All categories showed a highly significant correlation with the overall perception score ( p < 0.001), with learning outcome satisfaction showing the highest ( r = 0.8092) and class participation showing the lowest ( r = 0.346).
The model estimated the regression weights of quadratic terms to be 0.0004, 0.0004, and 0.0003 for anxiety, depression, and confusion, respectively, which are highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The association is highly significant (R 2 = 0.56, p<0.001).
The MP‐NN score showed an increasing trend from HC to LUAD, with significantly higher scores in patients with LUAD than those in HC and LBD ( p < 0.001, Figure 2B ).
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001), comparing medians (5.0 and 3.0) (rank sum test).
Correlations of miRNA-33a and miR-122 with BMI were positively highly significant ( r = 0.823 and 0.965 and p < 0.001).
The difference was found to be highly significant statistically (p = 0.001).
This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001; n = 23 untreated group; n = 25 CASP group).