Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

a significant trendP=0.0010.0× alphagold
There was a significant trend of decreasing risk with increasing number of live births (P=0.001), and women remaining nulliparous after treatment completion conferred the highest risk (standardised incidence ratio 1.57 (1.37 to 1.79); table 3 ).
highly significantP<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, the temporal patterns of total epizootics ( Fig 2A ) and human cases ( Fig 2D ) (based on data from the Ministry of Health) and the YFV infection in NHP studied here were roughly equivalent ( Fig 2B ), and the temporal smooth was both highly significant (P<0.001; Table 2 ) and accounted for a large proportion of the model deviance (R = 0.54 and R = 0.22; Table 3 ).
highly significantp values <0·0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The immediate reductions in transmissibility accounting for the effect of PHSMs were highly significant (p values <0·001) and with estimated reductions ranging from 17% (95% CI 13 to 21) to 41% (35 to 46) across the locations and countries, with comparatively higher reductions for Hong Kong and Italy, for which the COVID-19 PHSMs were implemented just before or around the expected seasonal peak ( figure 2 , table , appendix 1 p 21 ).
highly significantP < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Two-proportion Z tests revealed that the differences in proportions of populations in the EHR-vs registry-derived datasets were highly significant for all cohorts ( P < .001) ( Table 1 C). 3.2 Cohort modelling The EHR- and registry-derived data were used to calculate the predicted proportion, and statistically representative range, for each demographic cohort for hypothetical US SLE trials of 100 subjects and 300 subjects.
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This increase was highly significant with large effect sizes for all domains, ranging from “(b) pharmacological treatment of ADHD” ( F (1, 287) = 475.48, p < .001, partial η 2 = 0.62) to “(a) psychopathological assessment” ( F (1, 283) = 1250.75, p < .001, partial η 2 = 0.82).
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For deep invasion, the AUC was 0.649 for T2WI, 0.906 for T2WI + DWI, and 0.906 for T2WI + DCE-MRI (Tables 4 , 5 ) The chi-square test revealed a highly significant association between the MRI findings and the histopathological stage for T2WI (χ2 = 28.666, p = 0.001), T2WI + DWI (χ2 = 66.696, p = 0.0005), and T2WI + DCE-MRI (χ2 = 78.186, p = 0.0005) (Tables 6 - 8 ).