Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Discussion In this study, a highly significant negative correlation ( r = –0.992, P = 0.001) was observed between DM accumulation and the R/FR ratio in the different spectral profiles provided by the different colored films, indicating that the DM accumulation was greatly affected by far-red light in G. longituba .
an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Results For the index scores of the two groups, the results of repeated-measures ANOVA indicated an increasing trend at three time points, i.e., after 2 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 3 months after the end of treatment ( p < 0.001); in terms of intergroup effects, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in WAB naming scores ( F = 4.865, p = 0.042); and the aphasia quotient (AQ), listening comprehension, and naming scores of the two groups had interactive effects ( F AQ = 11.316, P AQ = 0.000; F listening = 8.205, P listening = 0.002; F naming = 27.46, P naming = 0.000).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant proportion of women in the intervention areas than in control areas reported antenatal care visits during pregnancy (92% vs 76%, p < .001), uptake of TT vaccination during pregnancy (67% vs 47%, p < .001) and delivery conducted at health facility (85% vs 71%, p < .001) at end line.
highly significantP <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For both energy models (LMM LEClaw , LMM LECar ), the interaction term was highly significant ( P <0.001; Table S2 ) and six individual post hoc models (LMMD EnergyClaw , LMMD EnergyCar , LMMBD EnergyClaw , LMMBD EnergyCar , LMMNP EnergyClaw , LMMNP EnergyCar ) further tested the effect of claw and carapace size on the energy of the three behavioural groups whilst controlling for repeated measures.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, consistent with H2a, this effect was negative and highly significant in the mating condition, β = −0.24, 95% CI [−0.33, −0.16], p < 0.001, suggesting that when females imagined an attractive potential partner, they preferred more feminine (vs. masculine) foods.