Results A positive, moderately significant relationship was found between health literacy and health‐promoting and protective behaviours ( r = 0.460, p < 0.001).
Excerpts
It is noteworthy, however, that the correlation is highly significant (KTCC = 0.68, p-value<0.001, N = 21) if we exclude the four epitopes for which we have least confidence in our inferred rates ( Figure S1 ).
Comparing the ALS‐IPS with clinically derived stages based on the King's College system in all ALS subjects reveals a significant trend ( p = 0.001) of higher ALS‐IPS in progressive King's College stages (Figure 3B ).
In addition, despite the presence of the correlation between total 25(OH)D and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and vitamin B6, it was borderline significant, in contrast to free 25(OH)D, which was correlated with these parameters with p < 0.001.
The differences between WT and KO mice are highly significant ( p < 0.001) at both 16 and 22.6 kHz.
A repeated measures ANOVA with the factors category and confidence revealed a highly significant main effect of confidence ( F (1,27) = 88.083, P < 0.001; no other effects, P ≥ 0.694) such that high-confident hits yielded higher subsequent source accuracy than low-confident hits.
A highly significant decrease of Adlercreutzia equolifaciens ( P < 0.001) was detected only in PSC patients without concomitant IBD.
In fact at 5 min, the difference in mean TER (% of control value) between butaprost and AH6809 treated group (85% vs 116%) was highly significant (p<0.001).
Serum E1S showed a decrease in postmenopausal women with malignant breast tu- mors compared to those with benign breast tumors (P < 0.02) without any significant difference was found among the premenopausal groups. Estriol (E3) was only significantly increased during the luteal phase in women with malignantbreast tumors than their corresponding women with benign breast tumors (P < 0.05). Remarkably, over all the three different populations, Testosterone (T) showed a highly significant decrease in women with malignant breast tumors (P < 0.001 for follicular; P < 0.05 for luteal and P < 0.005 for postmenopausal respectively) (Table 3).
AMOVA results showed that the genetic differences between and within populations were extremely significant ( P < 0.001), at 6.01 and 93.99%, respectively, indicating that the genetic differences mainly came from within populations.
When compared to the control group, it was highly significant (P < 0.001).
Progressing from No-DR to S-NPDR, there was a significant trend of worsening visual acuity (logMAR BCVA P < 0.001) and thinning of the choroid (SFCT P < 0.001).
Results There was an increasing trend in Google queries for PRP and shoulder ( R 2 = 0.669, P < .001), elbow ( R 2 = 0.284, P < .001), hip ( R 2 = 0.648, P < .001), knee ( R 2 = 0.802, P < .001), ankle ( R 2 = 0.240, P < .001), and foot ( R 2 = 0.040, P = .009).
The analysis revealed a strong positive co-expression correlation between the two genes, with R = 0.95 and a highly significant p-value (p<0.001), the raw data are presented in Supplementary Table 5 .
AMs of both age groups showed high preferential uptake for (-)NPs; however, the aged AM group demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in uptake of (-)NPs ( Fig. 4 B ) .
Intention-to-treat analysis showed highly significant improvements ( P < 0.001) with large effect sizes (>0.8) with both interventions, but there were no significant differences between groups in primary outcomes.
Our study highlighted that there was a highly significant association between good knowledge and good attitude ( P < 0.001), and also, it was seen that participants with good practice also had good attitude which was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
Studies from China showed a marginally significant association (Hedges g = 1.557, 95% CI = 1. 405–1.710, P < 0.001), while the additional studies showed highly significant results (Hedges g = 1.619, 95% CI = 1.295–1.942, P < 0.001, Figure 4 ).
All the three preloading fluids, including Ringer’s Lactate used as control, were seen to significantly increase the capillary blood glucose levels intra-operatively ( P < 0.05), but the rise with Dextran-40 was seen to be sustained and highly significant ( P < 0.001).
(2) In case of highly significant correlation of p < 0.001 between a pair of variables, only one of the two concerned variables was selected based on clinical rationale.
This variation was highly significant, with the significance level being P < 0.001.
The difference in survival rate between patients referred and not referred to palliative is highly significant: only 1 in 37 (3%) patients referred to palliative care was still alive 3 years on whereas 14 of the 38 (37%) not referred were alive ( P < .001).
The Gender parameter in the SDV model was found to be non-significant, despite being highly significant (p≤.001) in the three other models.
Relative water content Analysis of variance showed highly significant effects of cultivar and treatment on RWC, with a strong year × cultivar × treatment interaction ( P < 0.001, Table 1 , Fig. 2 ), confirming RWC as the most drought-sensitive parameter.
This analysis revealed a highly significant main effect [ F (1, 140) = 137.23, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.50].