Excerpts

From Day 7 onwards, the nHA/CS/CoL group showed an extremely significant difference compared to the nHA/CoL group ( p < 0.001, ### ).

All of these associations were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ).

For soil pH, the main effects of both PE-MPs and TSB were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while their interaction was not significant ( p = 0.213).

Clutch size and nestling survival in non-predated clutches Laying date of the first egg had a highly significant negative effect on clutch size (model #4: − 0.178 ± 0.014 SE, t = − 12.8, n = 736, p < 0.001).

In contrast, a highly significant association was identified between preoperative skin marking and procedural success (P < 0.001).

This overlap between cohort 1 and cohort 2 was highly significant ( P <0.001) (permutation test, based on 1000 random shufflings of H3K4me3 peaks genome-wide).

The heat shock temperature was found to have a highly significant effect on activating ascospore germination (two-way nonparametric ANOVA; H = 43.20, df = 3, p < 0.001) ( Supplemental Figure S2 ).

9 , 17 , 32 Brain regions showed highly significant difference in telomere length ( P <0.001), with SN having the longest telomeres (average length=58.14) and DLPFC the shortest (average length=2.26) ( Figure 1 ).

The presence of SCLLS decreased the amount of 5-ALA transported through hairless mouse skin, after 36 hours to 500.9 (± 32.5) μg, a value considerably significantly ( P < 0.001) lower than 3681.0 (± 104.65) μg observed for aqueous solutions.

Also, there was a highly significant association between life history and strandedness ( p < 0.001, Chi-square test of independence; Supplementary Data 3 ), with life history explaining 38–41% of the variability in the distribution of strand types across lineages (Table 3 ).

coli showed highly significant variation between sources ( p < 0.001).

The probability ( p ) value was considered significant at a level < 0.05 and highly significant when p < 0.001.

For the FrAGe NE subscale, compared with time×CG, we found highly significant differences between time×REMOTION ( b =0.03; P <.001), but not for time×Res-Up!

There was a highly significant improvement in FSDS-R scores as a measure for sexual distress ( p < 0.001; see Table 3 ).

Cochran’s Q test was highly significant for bilirubin ( Q = 44,447; df = 20; p < 0.001), infection ( Q = 77.5, df = 19, p < 0.001) and “other” ( Q = 69.91, df = 11, p < 0.001) demonstrating that the observed variation in effect sizes exceeds that expected by chance alone and the I 2 statistic approached 100% (bilirubin), 81% (infection), 97% (other).

rs2383206 Similar to the SNP rs10757278, the genetic variations of rs2383206 among studied groups were found to be highly significant (p=0.001).

A linear mixed model showed a reliable main effect of source, χ 2 (2) = 26.74, p < .001, and a significant trend for the delta term of the model, χ 2 (1) = 36.39, p < .001: Participants were more influenced by other people (i.e., either teenagers or adults) than by the random computer (teenagers – computer: contrast = 0.90, SE = 0.19, p Bonf < .001; adults – computer: contrast = 0.64, SE = 0.15, p Bonf < .001; for all contrasts, see Table S9 in the Supplemental Material ), and increasing distance from the norms (i.e., the Δ) predicted increased magnitude of donation adjustment (estimate = 0.85, SE = 0.14, p < .001).

This interaction was highly significant for the normalized jerk (p < 0.001, Table 3 ), that was not mainly affected by type of stimuli (p = 0.489).

The difference between the PPV for trisomy 18 or 13 in the two groups was highly significant (Chi square p < 0.001).

In the patient group, there was a moderately significant negative relationship between SMMT score and age (p<0.001, r=-0.437), neutrophil count (p=0.033, r=-0.240), CRP (p<0.001, r=-0.451), and IBI (p<0.001, r=-0.538).

The interaction term for frailty and the diaphragm was highly significant (OR = 4.23, 95% CI: 2.37–7.54, p < 0.001), which further demonstrated supra‐additive synergy confirmed by additive interaction metrics (RERI = 1.94, AP = 0.46, SI = 2.31; all p < 0.05).

Statistical analyses were done using one way ANOVA and Tukey’s test in R program (alpha value 0.05) with P value <0.001 considered as highly significant. ‘***’ denotes P<0.001.

The gender distribution in plenary sessions showed a marked trend, with an increasing number of female speakers (p<0.001).

Although the Asian group contains only eight samples, the comparison with white patients is extremely significant ( p < 0.001).

Analysis of variance ( Table 3 ) confirmed that all factors had highly significant effects on titer (p < 0.001).