Excerpts

A highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in sepsis was revealed across the calendar periods with an almost 5-fold increase in 2014–2017 (RR 4.69 95% CI 3.69–5.96).

Our analysis also showed that patients suffering from dysphagia, according to SDQ and VVST results, were younger than those without dysphagia, in a highly significant way ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 5 ).

The result showed that the t value between confidence and knowledge was 5.7290, confidence and perception was 12.2330, and knowledge and perception was 48.9056, and the co-relation between all three of them was very highly significant ( p value ≤ 0.001) ( Table 4 ).

There was a marked trend by a graphical representation that serum neuritin levels were increased in the order of the scores from 0 to 6 ( p < 0.001; Supplementary Figure S6B ).

The overall mean increase in knowledge was 50.77 percentage points, with paired t-test results showing a highly significant difference between pre- and post-intervention scores (p < 0.001).

Using the LMR cutoff (2.083), Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a pronounced survival separation: median survival was 2.7 months in the low-LMR group (≤2.083) versus 14.5 months in the high-LMR group (>2.083), with a highly significant log-rank difference ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ).

There are highly significant differences between the two gender distributions according to the global academic results (p<0.001), but also significant differences (p<0.005) between the distributions of the two genders according to the academic results from the last attended examination session.

Relative Roles of Geographic and Environmental Isolation in Shaping Genetic Differentiation Mantel tests ( Figure 5 a,b) revealed a highly significant positive correlation between genetic and geographic distance ( r = 0.7274, p < 0.001), and a significant positive correlation between genetic and environmental distance ( r = 0.3613, p < 0.05).

By performing sensitive sequence analysis using the generalized profile method 12 , we found this structural similarity to be mirrored by a distant but highly significant sequence relationship ( p < 0.001) between these families.

A highly significant range-variance congruency, F (1, 29) = 37.9, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.12, suggests that participants were more accurate when range and variance conveyed consistent information ( M = 75%, SD = 6.3%), compared to the incongruent condition ( M = 67%, SD = 5.5%).

herbicolus was highly significant ( F 3,72 = 94.12, P < 0.001), with higher consumption of prey at earlier life stages ( Table 2 ).

These relationships were further quantified by comparing the change index during ICMS with the change index post-ICMS, revealing a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001, Figure 4 L).

Third, sensitivity checks confirmed the robustness of each predictor independently: when entered alone with morbidity, resilience remained a highly significant predictor of quality of life ( β = 0.387, p < 0.001), as did self‐efficacy when entered alone with morbidity ( β = 0.392, p < 0.001; Table S5 ).

Two-way ANOVA confirmed highly significant effects of salinity (S) and priming agent (PA) × S interactions on all germination parameters, including MFG, GRI, GSTI, and GR (green shading: p < 0.001; Table 2 ).

In contrast, highly significant correlations were found between MNSIQ scores and corneal nerve fiber parameters, including the CNFD, CNBD, and CNFL, in both the paracentral (all p < 0.001) and inferior-whorl regions ( p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively).

Furthermore, the linear-by-linear association indicated a significant trend ( p < 0.001).

The results were statistically highly significant (p < 0.001).

In 94 hypothyroid infertile females, the mean TSH levels were 8.34 ± 10.52 μIU/ml, and in 72 infertile women with hyperprolactinemia the mean PRL levels were 53.26 ± 47.17 ng/ml; and the difference in the levels of both these hormones in infertile women with hypothyroidism and/or hyperprolactinemia was highly significant compared to infertile women with normal levels ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].

The difference was highly significant (U = 120, p < 0.001), with a large effect size (rank-biserial r = 0.87).

As expected from the classification of the RTs according to duration, the main effect of bin was highly significant, p < .001.

In the manipulation study, the slope for the areas of the target knowledge was highly significant ( t (19) = 15.13, p < 0.001, d = 3.38, 95% CI diff [0.68, 0.90]).

A p- value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance, which was graduated as follows: p -value < 0.05 (significant), p -value < 0.01 (highly significant), and p -value < 0.001 (extremely significant).

These differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all variables.

The potential yield per hectare showed highly significant differences between the treatments ( p = 0.001), where T. koningiopsis (T-K11) showed higher production (1.60 ± 0.01 t/ha −1 ), presenting 64.04 pods per m 2 .

Combination therapy decreased the rate of pyuria to 38.5% which was quite significant ( P = 0.001).