Excerpts

According to ROC-analysis, ASP after 12 months showed a highly significant AUC of 0.94 (p <0.001) to differentiate between the two response groups.

Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 = 5856.148, df = 190, p < 0.001), confirming that correlations among items were sufficiently large to warrant factor extraction.

Specifically: several authors reported highly significant group differences ( p ≤ 0.001) [ 32 , 34 , 39 , 42 ].

The comparative analysis of perioperative data between the two surgical cohorts revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) for all monitored continuous variables.

A three-way rmANOVA for the eye movements from Experiment 1 demonstrated that matching eye movement and stimulus parameters—inducing retinal speeds below ±30 dva/s—led to a statistically highly significant increase in visual sensitivity (d’ = 3.05 ± 0.47) compared to trials with higher retinal velocities (d’ = 1.68 ± 0.40; F (1,8) = 264.24, p < 0.001; Figure 2d ).

We found a highly significant association between sources of information concerning EVD and urban and rural areas (Chi-square test: X 2 (2) = 19.989, p < 0.001).

Statistical significance is reported by the p value of the statistical test procedures and was assessed as significant (*, p < 0.05), strongly significant (**, p < 0.01), or highly significant (***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001).

Table 3 shows that the linear regression analysis revealed a strong predictive model, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.86 and a highly significant p-value (p<0.001).

The MIT showed a significant trend of the synchronous condition in inducing a stronger drift (MIT SYNC = 0.35 ± 0.08 m, MIT ASYNC = -0.013 ± 0.12 m, Wilcoxon sign rank p< 0.001, ES = 3.4, statistical power = 1).

The size difference is statistically highly significant increased in the mutant (t-test analysis, p<0,001).

Serious-critical showed a decreasing trend (p<0.001) from population status D (p<0.001) to IN: 9.2%, p<0.001, MIN: 47.6%, p<0.044 and S: 100% (reference).

Statistical analysis using an independent t-test revealed a highly significant difference between the groups (t = 9.02; p < 0.001), indicating elevated mucosal inflammatory response in formula-fed infants ( Table 1 ). 3.2.

The estimated p-value was highly significant for this relationship (P = 0.001).

All three components showed a clear trend of decrease in amplitude with increasing eccentricity [N1: F (6,54) = 27.07, p < 0.001; P1: F (6,54) = 21.73, p < 0.001; N2: F (6,54) = 20.98, p < 0.001].

However, in the case of Cairns, this pattern of results was highly significant ( χ 2 ( N = 1,099, df = 1) = 12.08, p < .001, Phi = .11).

Association between perceived stress and fat intake The correlation between fat intake and perceived stress as numerical variables was significant (ρ = 0.15, p-value = 0.005), and there was evidence of an increasing trend of fat intake associated with greater perceived stress (p<0.001).

Here, we use mother width as our size measure because preliminary analyses show that although length and width are strongly correlated ( r = .83), partial correlations with birth order indicate that the negative relationship between mother size and birth order is accounted for a highly significant partial correlation with width ( r = –.49; p < .001). 2.1.

There was a highly significant difference (P=0.001) in the mean DMFT score based on brushing frequency.

The statistical results were expressed as follows: non-significant for p > 0.05, statistically significant (*) for p < 0.05, very significant (**) for p < 0.01, and extremely significant for p < 0.001 (***) and for p < 0.0001 (****). 3.

Compared to the positive control group (i.e., treatment with BDNF; 65.38 ± 28.40 cells per well), a highly significant increase of survival was obtained ( p < 0.001).

For lesions length <5 cm, the lymph node metastasis rate was 14.7% (5/34), compared to 85.7% (12/14) for lesions ≥ 5 cm, with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

Only resistin displayed highly significant correlations with HDRS scores in the symptomatic groups after variables were adjusted by clinical confounders ( p = 0.001).

1 a), which was supported by a highly significant clone effect in the PERMANOVA (pseudo-F = 74.00, R 2 = 0.32, P = 0.001).

This represented a non-significant five-fold higher risk of maladaptive behaviour (RR 5.0 95% CI 0.55–45.39) and a highly significant risk of severe maladaptation (4/19 versus 0/19, p < 0.001).

The analysis revealed a strong response in the cells to MYO1C over-expression in form of a highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in the number of live cells starting at 48 hours post transfection and throughout the experiment time span ( Fig 3D ).