“a negative trend”

For ethnicity, Hispanic patients showed a positive trend (β = 0.02, p = 0.50), whereas non-Hispanic patients showed a negative trend (β = −0.005, p = 0.10).

No significant association was found between milk production and TMR DM (%) in the <20 kg/cow/d group ( p > 0.05), though a negative trend for total solids was observed ( p < 0.1). 3.3.

When examining multivariable models adjusted for potential confounders for 5-year anthropometry outcomes, only a negative trend ( p < 0.10) was seen between postnatal alcohol exposure and weight.

Stratification by sex identified no significant differential changes in medial RUNX2, although males demonstrated a negative trend and females a positive trend after denervation (male: 0.13% ± 0.1% [denervated] vs 1.1% ± 0.7% [sham]; P = .10; female: 0.85% ± 0.3% [denervated] vs 0.23% ± 0.09% [sham]; P = .10) ( Fig 3 , G ).

Finally, RIE showed a trend with time required for defecation (r = 0.16, p = 0.09), and Overall Quality of Life (OQoL) showed a negative trend with diaper use (r = −0.16, p = 0.10). 3.2.

denticulata showed a negative trend (r = −0.7035, p = 0.1070).

Although there was a negative trend between Beck and dominant pinch strength, the relationship was not significant ( p = 0.109) (see Table 4 ).

While temperature demonstrated a negative trend (R = −0.336, p = 0.109), it did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that its effect might be better captured through interaction terms or non-linear modeling approaches.

Although a negative trend was observed (β = −0.181), the association did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.110, R 2 = 0.047), suggesting that course length was not a major source of heterogeneity ( Figure 3D ).

The regression analysis ( Figure 6D ) suggested a negative trend (y = 119.2 - 0.06x), with a moderate correlation (R2 = 0.32) but insignificant results (p = 0.11).

No other significant correlations were observed, though abnormal_sum demonstrated a negative trend with SIR_3 year ( p = 0.111, marginal significance).

Among these factors, the most effective one was the sample size, which showed a negative trend on the prevalence in the cumulative meta-analysis and funnel plot; however, no significant relationship was observed in the meta-regression ( P =0.111).

To the right of the threshold, although a negative trend was observed between serum uric acid levels and femoral neck BMD, it did not reach statistical significance ( β = −0.000, 95% CI : −0.002 to 0.000, P = 0.117) ( Table 4 ).

A negative trend was found for a higher FARB score (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57–1.12, p = 0.12).

On the contrary, in females it showed a negative trend ( r = −0.13, P = 0.12).

The fraction of reads within OCRs showed a negative trend during aging, but it was not significant (Pearson’s r = -0.13, p = 0.12, Supplementary Fig. 4 a).

There was also a negative trend in the viral load in patients who underwent serological transition, although the difference was not statistically significant (R2: 0.03; p = 0.1214) ( Figure 7H ).

Also, a negative trend ( p = 0.125) was found after training during the trunk extension in sitting. 4.

There is also a negative trend in females, though the effect is not significant (Fig. 4 B; Spearman’s ⍴ = − 0.515; p = 0.13).

ctHPV16DNA/wbMTV did not correlate with texture features in Groups A and B, but had a negative trend with LGZE (Rho = − 0.29, p = 0.13 [ p < 0.05 before correction]) in Group B.

The correlation in the group of mRNA-1273 + mRNA-1273 was negligible, but it still showed a negative trend ( p = 0.1306 and r = −0.1957) ( Figure 1D ).

None of the correlations reached significance (partial r s = − 0.143, p = 0.783; absent: r s = − 0.214, p = 0.662) and PGE 2 /AA ratios in full myelinated regions showed a negative trend with immune cell activation ( r s = − 0.714, p = 0.136).

Age significantly predicted higher research quality barriers (Beta = 0.753, P = 0.038), while work experience showed a negative trend (Beta = −0.510, P = 0.157).

For example, although nonsignificant, the link between sentiment dominance and depression scores had a negative trend on Day 2, r 2 = 0.08, F (1, 13) = 2.17, β = −0.02, p = 0.16, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.008], but had a positive trend on Day 30, r 2 = 0.03, F (1, 12) = 1.38, β = 0.01, p = 0.26, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.03] ( Figure 3(b) and (c)), showing that patterns were inconsistent with bi-weekly sampling and small sample size.

While a negative trend towards smaller home ranges under supplementary feeding was observed, our dataset provided weak evidence ( p = 0.16) against the null hypothesis of no effect.