“a negative trend”

denticulata showed a negative trend (r = −0.7035, p = 0.1070).

While temperature demonstrated a negative trend (R = −0.336, p = 0.109), it did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that its effect might be better captured through interaction terms or non-linear modeling approaches.

Although there was a negative trend between Beck and dominant pinch strength, the relationship was not significant ( p = 0.109) (see Table 4 ).

Although a negative trend was observed (β = −0.181), the association did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.110, R 2 = 0.047), suggesting that course length was not a major source of heterogeneity ( Figure 3D ).

The regression analysis ( Figure 6D ) suggested a negative trend (y = 119.2 - 0.06x), with a moderate correlation (R2 = 0.32) but insignificant results (p = 0.11).

No other significant correlations were observed, though abnormal_sum demonstrated a negative trend with SIR_3 year ( p = 0.111, marginal significance).

Among these factors, the most effective one was the sample size, which showed a negative trend on the prevalence in the cumulative meta-analysis and funnel plot; however, no significant relationship was observed in the meta-regression ( P =0.111).

Further multiple linear regression analysis, controlling for gestational age, birth weight, and CRP, showed that serum DUOX2 levels remained independently positively correlated with RDW (β=0.86, [95% CI 0.03–1.69], P = 0.043) and LDH (β=74.7, [95% CI 33.9–115.4], P = 0.002), while showing a negative trend with albumin (β= -0.93, [95% CI -2.11–0.26], P = 0.113), though this did not reach statistical significance. 3.5 Analysis of risk factors for NEC in preterm infants with GA <32 weeks As shown in Table 3 , multifactorial analysis using logistic regression analysis of risk factors with significant di

To the right of the threshold, although a negative trend was observed between serum uric acid levels and femoral neck BMD, it did not reach statistical significance ( β = −0.000, 95% CI : −0.002 to 0.000, P = 0.117) ( Table 4 ).

A negative trend was found for a higher FARB score (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57–1.12, p = 0.12).

On the contrary, in females it showed a negative trend ( r = −0.13, P = 0.12).

The fraction of reads within OCRs showed a negative trend during aging, but it was not significant (Pearson’s r = -0.13, p = 0.12, Supplementary Fig. 4 a).

There was also a negative trend in the viral load in patients who underwent serological transition, although the difference was not statistically significant (R2: 0.03; p = 0.1214) ( Figure 7H ).

Also, a negative trend ( p = 0.125) was found after training during the trunk extension in sitting. 4.

There is also a negative trend in females, though the effect is not significant (Fig. 4 B; Spearman’s ⍴ = − 0.515; p = 0.13).

ctHPV16DNA/wbMTV did not correlate with texture features in Groups A and B, but had a negative trend with LGZE (Rho = − 0.29, p = 0.13 [ p < 0.05 before correction]) in Group B.

The correlation in the group of mRNA-1273 + mRNA-1273 was negligible, but it still showed a negative trend ( p = 0.1306 and r = −0.1957) ( Figure 1D ).

None of the correlations reached significance (partial r s = − 0.143, p = 0.783; absent: r s = − 0.214, p = 0.662) and PGE 2 /AA ratios in full myelinated regions showed a negative trend with immune cell activation ( r s = − 0.714, p = 0.136).

Age significantly predicted higher research quality barriers (Beta = 0.753, P = 0.038), while work experience showed a negative trend (Beta = −0.510, P = 0.157).

Additional analysis done separately for individual positive trait scores showed a significant negative correlation for agreeableness score (r = −0.36, p-value = 0.03) ( Fig S3a ) and a negative trend for openness (r = −0.24, p-value = 0.16), extraversion (r = −0.15, p-value = 0.37) and conscientiousness (r = −0.26, p-value = 0.12).

For example, although nonsignificant, the link between sentiment dominance and depression scores had a negative trend on Day 2, r 2 = 0.08, F (1, 13) = 2.17, β = −0.02, p = 0.16, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.008], but had a positive trend on Day 30, r 2 = 0.03, F (1, 12) = 1.38, β = 0.01, p = 0.26, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.03] ( Figure 3(b) and (c)), showing that patterns were inconsistent with bi-weekly sampling and small sample size.

While a negative trend towards smaller home ranges under supplementary feeding was observed, our dataset provided weak evidence ( p = 0.16) against the null hypothesis of no effect.

Although no statistically significant differences were observed, exploratory analyses indicated a negative trend (Spearman r = −0.205, p = 0.168) and a moderate effect size (Cohen's d = 0.524) between the highest and lowest quintiles of onion shipment.

The analysis revealed a negative trend between HOI and the stiffness of the soft fraction ( β = –0.68, R 2 = 0.20, p = 0.17), indicating a reduction of compliant nuclei as chromatin clustering increased.

A negative trend was also seen for BA Blood in brainstem remyelination (reduction by 0.02 pu/year in adjusted model, CI [−0.01, 0.05], P = 0.17).