“a numerical trend”

There seems to be a numerical trend of interference, but the effect of Interference wasn't significant ( p > 0.2) (licensed 434 ms; unlicensed 480 ms; interference 458 ms).

Moreover, exploratory stage stratified analyses showed a numerical trend towards greater absolute benefit in stage II/III disease than in stage I disease (hazard ratio 0.61 for stage II/III versus 0.76 for stage I), but the test for interaction between stage (I versus II/III) and carboplatin effect was not significant (P for interaction=0.63).

These results looked similar to those previously reported for cobimetinib plus paclitaxel without atezolizumab, but there was a numerical trend for a higher response rate in subgroups with PD-L1-positive tumor-infiltrating immune cells.

However, there was a numerical trend for a greater rate of eADP metabolism to eAMP by HNC sEV compared to HD sEV which was driven by a single outlier and thus was not significant.

Nonetheless, there was a numerical trend favoring the intermediate dose, suggesting potential added benefit in patients at higher risk of progression.

This conclusion, however, should be taken with caution as in both experiments there was at least a numerical trend for the preparation effect to be somewhat larger in the informative condition than in the distracting condition.

Moreover, there was a numerical trend towards more error-prone responses after go trials than cue-only trials (8.6% vs. 7.2%).

While recurrence rates of spontaneous pneumothorax did not reach statistical significance, there was just a numerical trend favoring the C-shaped cautery group.

While the NOTUS trial did not achieve statistical significance for mean SGRQ change, it indicated a numerical trend toward improvement.

We observed only a numerical trend toward enrichment for cancer- or CRC-specific family history among patients in whom a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome was identified, possibly due to the small sample size.

For instance, the co-supplementation M + P showed a numerical trend toward mitigating the acetate reduction observed with probiotic P supplementation alone and resulted in distinct metabolic fingerprints in the distal colon, specifically altered abundance patterns of 1,603 metabolic features (m/z signals) as detected by LA-REIMS analysis, with valid OPLS-DA model differentiation (Q 2 (Y) ≥ 0.5) compared to controls.

PFS by BICR showed a numerical trend favoring nivolumab plus SOC across multiple subgroups (HR<1) ( figure 3 ).

Conclusions Pediatric tracheostomy is a safe and effective airway intervention; however, infants weighing < 5 kg showed a numerical trend toward higher rates of cannula-related technical complications and longer hospitalizations in this cohort.

In terms of tumor response, T-DXd showed a numerical trend toward being the top-ranked intervention (SUCRA: ORR 0.819; DCR 0.803; CBR 0.833) and demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared to TPC in both DCR (RR =0.32; 95% CI: 0.11–0.88) and CBR (RR =3.60; 95% CI: 1.06–12.60); while T-DXd also numerically outperformed SG in ORR, DCR, and CBR, these pairwise differences were not statistically significant ( Figure 6 and Table 2 ).

19 None of these interventions proved to be effective, even as a numerical trend, in reducing premature delivery or the proportion of small for gestational age (SGA) infants.

Taken together with the analysis of the primary endpoint in Table 3 , these results show that there is a numerical trend of continuous improvement in pain (API-NRS) from baseline to week 6 and a stabilization of the response between 6 and 8 weeks (ie, no additional improvement in pain intensity) in the LY3526318 arm, while the response to placebo shows continuous improvement.

Despite a numerical trend toward slightly lower survival in the prior MI group, confidence intervals overlapped at all time points, and no statistically significant difference was observed.

Subgroup analyses Annualized relapse rate The significant reduction in ARR observed in the overall pooled analysis of the ITT population with ocrelizumab, relative to IFN β-1a (47% [ p < 0.001]), was maintained across the majority of subgroup-levels, including study, region, age, sex, baseline BMI, prior DMT use and prior relapse, baseline EDSS, normalized brain volume, and gadolinium-enhancing T1 lesions; a numerical trend favoring ocrelizumab was observed for the specific subgroup strata of patients aged ≥ 40 years (Fig. 1 ).

That is, although there is a numerical trend, self-judged accuracy (confidence) itself is not enough driving the reminder bias.

Although not statistically significant, there was a numerical trend suggesting that pregnancy was associated with a history of non-participation in cervical cancer screening, despite equivalent levels of awareness.

Then, HR remained stable throughout the experimental period in MAS + CBD whereas in MAS + VEH it was a numerical trend to a decrease in HR which did not reach statistical significance.

Among males, there was a numerical trend towards lower serum testosterone levels in patients harbouring a TA allele, which did not attain statistical significance ( TA/TA : 3.75 ± 2.03 vs T/TA : 4.95 ± 3.62 vs T/T : 5.65 ± 3.02; P = .339; Figure S4). 4 DISCUSSION Recently, a study linking exome sequence data from the DiscovEHR cohort 13 to electronic health records reported, that the HSD17B13 rs72613567 T > TA variant is associated with reduced risks of ALD/NAFLD as well as alcoholic and non‐alcoholic cirrhosis.

Although not statistically significant, the ESRD subgroup showed a numerical trend toward higher LDL-C in TT carriers, which is directionally consistent with the overall analysis.

There was, however, a numerical trend of this effect, which can be observed at the critical verb region in both groups, showing a larger reading time difference between grammatical and ungrammatical sentences with a number-specified determiner compared to a bare determiner (L1: 20 ms vs 8 ms respectively; L2: 105 ms vs 59 ms respectively).

4 Overall survival (OS) analyses at SA1 revealed a numerical trend favoring D+CT versus P+CT (median 19.4 months [95% CI: 14.5–not reached] versus 15.9 months [95% CI: 11.6–19.3]; HR: 0.75 [95% CI: 0.53–1.05]; 55% maturity), 5 which was maintained at SA2 (DCO April 30, 2024; 20.2 mo [95% CI: 14.5–27.3] versus 15.9 mo [95% CI: 11.6–19.3]; HR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.54–1.0