Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

6,249 sentences · 6,249 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp = 0.0350.7× alphagold
Regarding the parameters related to kidney function, patients with Obesity/T2DM showed lower eGFR compared to their counterparts without T2DM ( p < 0.001) with a significant trend across the groups ( p = 0.035) (Fig. 1 ).
a significant trendp = 0.0370.7× alphagold
However, women with BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 demonstrated the strongest associations, with the second lowest MAR quartile showing the highest risk (OR = 4.20, 95% CI: 1.30–13.50), followed by the lowest quartile (OR = 3.17) and third quartile (OR = 2.64), with a significant trend ( p = 0.037).
a significant trendP = 0.0370.7× alphagold
Lanes 1 and 2 Patient 1, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 3 and 4 Patient 2, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 5 and 6 Patient 3, Normal (Void) and cancer tissue; Lanes 7 and 8 Patient 4, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 9 and 10 Patient 5, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 11 and 12 Patient 6, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lane 13, Water negative control; Lane 14, SW948 positive control. 192 RCA Macadam et al British Journal of Cancer (2000) 83(2), 188-195 (c) 2000 Cancer Research Campaign examined, there was a significant trend indicating a diminished 5-year survival in node-negative patients whose tumours co-expressed REG and PAP (Figure 5) (Chi-squared = 8.46, P = 0.037).
a significant trendP = .03800.8× alphagold
A positive response to CS was observed in 15 of 17 group 1 volunteers (83%), compared with just 9 of 16 volunteers in group 2 (56%), with a significantly higher frequency of IFN-γ–producing CD4 + T cells in group 1 (Figure 6 C ). Ex vivo IFN-γ ELISPOT analysis revealed a trend toward higher responses to CS peptides in group 1 as compared to group 2 ( P = .0517, by the Mann–Whitney test on combined groups); when assessed by peptide pool, a significant trend toward higher responses was observed in pool 1 ( P = .0380, by the Mann–Whitney test).
a significant trendp = 0.0380.8× alphagold
Condition-by-order-by-sex comparisons revealed significant interaction effects for ratings of ease of falling asleep (F (1, 17.44) = 5.15, p = 0.036) ( Table 4 ), with post hoc analysis reporting a significant trend for females in the CON condition who completed the CON condition first (mean difference = −1.202, SE = 0.348, t (38.757) = −3.449, p = 0.038).