Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

9,357 sentences · 9,357 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendp=0.0360.7× alphagold
Although the percentage of patients who died or experienced worsening HF at 14 days was lower and the percentage of patients with myocardial ischaemia was higher in the levosimendan group, the differences did not reach statistical significance.[ 41 ] Overall, the percentage of patients meeting the primary composite endpoint criteria at 14 days was lower, albeit not significantly, with levosimendan (21.2% versus 26.2%).[ 41 ] At 6 months, the non-significant trends for death and worsening HF were supplemented by a significant trend for a lower incidence of MI in the levosimendan group between 14 days and 6 months (3.8% versus 13.8%; HR 0.261; p=0.036).[ 41 ] As a result, there was a significant treatment effect of levosimendan on the composite primary endpoint (43.7% versus 62.5%; HR 0.636; 95% CI [0.413–0.981]; p=0.041; Figu
a significant trendP = 0.0370.7× alphagold
Lanes 1 and 2 Patient 1, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 3 and 4 Patient 2, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 5 and 6 Patient 3, Normal (Void) and cancer tissue; Lanes 7 and 8 Patient 4, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 9 and 10 Patient 5, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lanes 11 and 12 Patient 6, Normal tissue and cancer tissue; Lane 13, Water negative control; Lane 14, SW948 positive control. 192 RCA Macadam et al British Journal of Cancer (2000) 83(2), 188-195 (c) 2000 Cancer Research Campaign examined, there was a significant trend indicating a diminished 5-year survival in node-negative patients whose tumours co-expressed REG and PAP (Figure 5) (Chi-squared = 8.46, P = 0.037).
a significant trendp = 0.0370.7× alphagold
However, women with BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 demonstrated the strongest associations, with the second lowest MAR quartile showing the highest risk (OR = 4.20, 95% CI: 1.30–13.50), followed by the lowest quartile (OR = 3.17) and third quartile (OR = 2.64), with a significant trend ( p = 0.037).
a significant trendP = .03800.8× alphagold
A positive response to CS was observed in 15 of 17 group 1 volunteers (83%), compared with just 9 of 16 volunteers in group 2 (56%), with a significantly higher frequency of IFN-γ–producing CD4 + T cells in group 1 (Figure 6 C ). Ex vivo IFN-γ ELISPOT analysis revealed a trend toward higher responses to CS peptides in group 1 as compared to group 2 ( P = .0517, by the Mann–Whitney test on combined groups); when assessed by peptide pool, a significant trend toward higher responses was observed in pool 1 ( P = .0380, by the Mann–Whitney test).
a significant trendp = 0.0380.8× alphagold
Condition-by-order-by-sex comparisons revealed significant interaction effects for ratings of ease of falling asleep (F (1, 17.44) = 5.15, p = 0.036) ( Table 4 ), with post hoc analysis reporting a significant trend for females in the CON condition who completed the CON condition first (mean difference = −1.202, SE = 0.348, t (38.757) = −3.449, p = 0.038).
a significant trendp=0.0390.8× alphagold
However, there was a significant trend in the association between change in SNAP score and P-MSSS score (p=0.039), such that those who decreased their SNAP score during follow-up (increasing risk factors) had greater disability worsening, while those who increased their score (decreasing risk factors) had lower disability worsening ( Table 3 ; Figure 1 with geometric means).