Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

9,357 sentences · 9,357 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendP = 0.0330.7× alphagold
Subgroup analysis (tracer type, molecular subtype) was corrected using Bonferroni, and the corrected P -value threshold was 0.05/2 = 0.025: The original P = 0.037 in the tracer group → adjusted P = 0.074 (with a significant trend), and the original P = 0.033 in the molecular subtype → adjusted P = 0.066 (the differential trend still exists).
a significant trendP = 0.03400.7× alphagold
PFS analysis by quartiles of PLCγ1 expression [Q1 (0%–25%), Q2 (25%–50%), Q3 (50%–75%), and Q4 (75%–100%)] showed a significant trend that higher-expression patients progress faster under cetuximab therapy (log-rank test for trend, * P = 0.0340), with a clear distinction between Q1–2 versus Q3–4 patients (Supplementary Fig.
a significant trendp = 0.0340.7× alphagold
As demonstrated by linear regression model in Table 4 we observed a significant trend that survivors with CCI ≥ 1 ( β = 5.2, p = 0.034), tumor sits at nasopharynx ( β =-9.1, p = 0.034), or treated by 2DRT ( β =-12.2, p < 0.01) had a higher probability to report a high level of xerostomia.
a significant trendp = 0.0340.7× alphagold
A significant trend towards better local control in hypoFx patients could be observed (overall LC 58.2% for nFx vs 90.5% for hypoFx, HR = 0.15, 95%CI: 0.02-0.86, p = 0.034) and high-dose PTV volume > 60 cm3 was a significant risk factor for locoregional progression (Figure 1). 11 patients (28.9%) developed ≥ G3 serious late complications, mostly soft tissue necrosis and infections which eventually improved in 6 of them.
a significant trendP = 0.0350.7× alphagold
When analyzed as a categorical variable, the multivariable- AOR from the lowest to highest quintiles of percentage energy from carbohydrate were 1 (reference), 1.062 (95% CI: 0.892–1.264), 1.263 (95% CI: 1.031–1.546), and 1.411 (95% CI: 1.083–1.839), with a significant trend ( P = 0.035).
a significant trendp = 0.0350.7× alphagold
Regarding the parameters related to kidney function, patients with Obesity/T2DM showed lower eGFR compared to their counterparts without T2DM ( p < 0.001) with a significant trend across the groups ( p = 0.035) (Fig. 1 ).
a significant trendP = 0.0350.7× alphagold
There was a significant trend with average hours of night work per week ( P = 0.035), but no significantly raised risks for hours worked per night, nights worked per week, average hours worked per week, cumulative years of employment, cumulative hours, time since cessation, type of occupation, age starting night shift work, or age starting in relation to first pregnancy.