“a significant trend”

Although prognosis was not significantly different according to BCPR expression in PT and LN samples ( Figure 3 A(b,c),B(b,c)), there was a significant trend toward worse OS in PT + LN samples with high BCRP expression (log-rank p = 0.19; Figure 3 B(d)).

arvalis (F 1,23 = 3.94, p = 0.06), and, not in a significant trend, in M. glareolus (F 1,81 = 1.73, p = 0.19).

Propensity score matched cohorts were built with age, sex, history of mental disorder and ICU stay as a-priori variables, and any variables with a significant trend ( p < 0.2) in bivariate analyses [ 18 ].

Moderated mediational models indicated no significant moderated indirect effect, however, a significant trend of indirect effect only in the BPD group was observed, whereby the no-BPD group showed a stronger direct effect (β=-0.19, t=-1.30, p=.20), whereas the BPD group showed a stronger indirect effect (β=-0.72, SE=0.45, CI= -1,71, -0.00).

Cumulative meta-analysis did not show a significant trend for overall complications by study era ( P = 0.205), and for studies that reported use of a single biopsy needle size for procedures, there was no significant difference in the overall complication rate between 16G and 18G needles ( P = 0.334) ( Supplementary Figures S1 and S2 ).

Monthly enrollment rates did not demonstrate a significant trend over time (Mann-Kendall test tau = –0.216; p = 0.21).

verrucosa ; Figure 1 ; Sallan and Galimberti, 2015 ) and do not display a significant trend in body size over time (8% on average per million-year, p = 0.21; Figure 4C ).

The breast cancer risk did not show a significant trend ( P = 0.21) across intake categories.

The Cold zone had the largest and significantly advanced trend during the same period with a rate of 0.27 days/year ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 a), whereas the Tibetan Plateau zone did not show a significant trend ( p = 0.213; Figure 3 d).

Results did not show a significant trend for intake tertiles for associations with CS (week 12, p = 0.2167; week 32, p = 0.2019) and VA (week 12, p = 0.6640; week 32, p = 0.6367).

NSAIDs use did not show a significant trend ( p = 0.220). 3.3.

However, we did not find a significant trend when comparing the ASCs of flagellar proteins with their lengths or abundances ( 38 ) (Spearman’s r s = −0.189 and −0.255, P = 0.232 and 0.209, respectively) (see Fig.

The Z component of the SVG vector did not show a significant trend with RV/LV ratio ( p = .24).

Subgroup analysis showed significantly higher HR from retrospective studies (HR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.09–3.29, z = 2.27, p = 0.02, τ 2 = 0.20, I2 = 44.71%), while such a significant trend was not confirmed pooling results from RCTs (HR: 1.70, 95% CI: 0.70–4.08, z = 1.18, p = 0.24, τ 2 = 0.61, I2 = 63.91%), among which a significant heterogeneity occurred ( Supplementary Materials—Figure S12 ).

On the contrary, Figure 3 B shows that natural killer lymphocytes ( p = 0.131), natural killer lymphocyte granzyme + ( p = 0.521), T cytotoxic lymphocyte granzyme + ( p = 0.760), T natural killer lymphocytes ( p = 0.131), total plasma cells ( p = 0.822) and Ab-secreting plasma cells ( p = 0.497) did not have a significant trend among the four groups, nor did the number of days to negative nasopharyngeal swab ( p = 0.241).

The mice treated with the GTP did not show such a significant trend ( Fig. 2 E, p = 0.260, Student's t-test).

Those carrying both Bw4Ile80 and KIR3DS1 did not display a significant trend towards higher CD4+ T cell counts over the period of observation (+ 40 cells/uL [SE = 36.5], p = 0.27, Figure 1 C), and displayed a trend towards a reduction in viral loads (−0.22 log 10 [SE = 0.15] lower HIV-1 RNA copies/mL, p = 0.14, Figure 1 C) relative to those who did not carry both genes.

The cumulative meta-analysis did not reveal a significant trend over time ( P = 0.28), although there was a slight tendency toward a decrease in the stricture resolution rate over time ( Fig. 1a ).

DM biomedicine cost didn’t show a significant trend (p = 0.284).

In control lines we did not observe a significant trend (10 lines with a decrease, 5 with an increase, 5 remained constant, P = 0.30, two-tailed sign test), with an overall reduction of 20%.

It is noteworthy that the identical analysis was applied to FA-based, AD-based, and RD-based fingerprints but none showed a significant trend ( p = 0.3092, 0.4130, and 0.0702, respectively).

No significant difference in CD9 presence was found between stages ( p = 0.67), nor was there a significant trend ( p = 0.31) in the current data.

The data from the late time-to-hatch colony did not show a significant trend with age (F = 1.20, DF = 1, p = 0.31; r 2 = 0.15).

Whilst all other precipitation variables indicated statistically significant changes over time, the seasonal mean precipitation did not show a significant trend ( p = 0.323; α = 0.05).

The data were tested for temporal smoothness using augmented Dickey–Fuller (ADF) tests and showed a significant trend ( t = −1.905, P = .330) ( Table 1 ), and the autocorrelation and partial autocorrelation of the data series were both trailing ( Figure 6a ).