“a statistical trend”

There was a statistical trend for the full‐thickness constructs to also be more resistant to deformation compared to the partial‐thickness within the cruciate suture pattern specimens with mean (SD) values reported at 2.79 (1.03) N/mm compared to 8.36 (5.93) N/mm. 3.1.3.

A statistical trend was also observed in BDKRB2 (+9/−9) and LEP (G–2548A) heterozygous genotypes among male and female Greek athletes, and in ACE (I/D) only in male athletes.

There was a statistical trend for patients in this group to have a lower level of education.

Furthermore, there was no clear and strong direct dependence of any of the g‐factors on the externalizing dimension of p (n.b., the dependence of the P/NVR factor was a statistical trend).

Of studies where this relationship was investigated ( n = 6), two found that with increasing ball speed, there was a statistical trend [ 87 ] and a statistically significant relationship with increased head acceleration [ 91 ].

Statistical significance was accepted from p < 0.05 and a statistical trend was considered when 0.05 < p < 0.1. 3.

For these 3 statistically significant factors and the 2 other factors for which there was a statistical trend, a multivariate analysis was realized (Table 4 ).

However, the reverse association was only a statistical trend.

78 genes within those CNVs were identified to show nominally significant association (48 genes), or a statistical trend in their association (30 genes) with the time animals spent on the open arms of the elevated plus-maze (EPM).

Differences in the diversity matrix with p- value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, while differences with values of 0.05 < p < 0.1 indicated a statistical trend.

A statistical trend in the same direction was observed for “pessimistic thoughts” item (−0.8 ± 0.5 vs. −1.9 ± 0.4, 0.094), as well as week-8 clinical global impression-improvement (CGI-I) scale scores (2.0 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3, p = 0.091).

For this aspect of the pain experience as well, it also appears that the superiority of music over sound, and of sound over silence at a statistical trend level, held regardless of conditioning.

A p -value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while a p -value between 0.05 and 0.1 was considered to indicate a statistical trend.

Statistical significance was defined at a level of p < 0.05, and a p < 0.10 was regarded as a statistical trend toward change.

Noticeably, a statistical trend for hypermetabolism was similarly found within the thalamus and putamen during symptomatic KLS episodes compared to healthy controls, without any changes within these areas between KLS at baseline and controls.

A value of p < 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance and a value of p < 0.10 was considered a statistical trend. 3.

A p value < 0.050 was considered statistically significant, and a p value < 0.100 was regarded as a statistical trend.

It is noteworthy that in our gene expression analyses, PDL1 reached a statistical trend, suggesting the potential existence of a biological interrelationship between the two immune checkpoints.

A p value <0.05 was defined to be statistically significant; p < 0.1 was considered as a statistical trend.

There was also a statistical trend for mothers of children without ADHD to report having a higher level of education compared to mothers of children with ADHD.

KM survival analyses revealed a statistical trend favoring improved survival in the low-risk group compared to the high-risk group.

However, it is assumed that the methods applied within this preliminary study can show a statistical trend.

A statistical trend was considered to be present when the p-value was between 0,05 and 0,1.

Considering only the readmission for BSD, we observed a difference in favor of the PC arm (7% vs 0%) with a statistical trend.

It is possible that, by controlling access to an oxalate diet or using oral administration of OXA by gavage, the parameters that presented a statistical trend could in fact be significantly different.