“a statistical trend”

The overall level of statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05 and p < 0.1 for a statistical trend.

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05, while p -values between 0.05 and 0.10 were interpreted as indicating a statistical trend. 3.

A p -value that was less than 0.05 indicated a significant difference, whereas a p -value less than 0.10 indicated a statistical trend.

469 In a separate small 6‐month placebo‐controlled trial, there was a statistical trend for lower relapse rates with fluoxetine compared to placebo. 503 Finally, a post hoc analysis of a large 12‐month placebo‐controlled trial found that response rates to fluoxetine were similar in BDII and MDD. 468 However, it did not report whether fluoxetine was superior to placebo in BDII.

Statistical significance was assessed at p ≤ 0.05; p > 0.05 and p ≤ 0.10 indicate a statistical trend. 3.

In addition, the starch content in the ileal digesta was higher in rabbits fed the high-starch diet compared to rabbits fed the low-starch diet, and there was a statistical trend for a higher caecal digesta starch content.

There was a statistical trend towards higher rates of suboptimal cytoreduction in older women, where 57% of women younger than 54 years had complete cytoreduction to no macroscopic residual disease, 33% had optimal cytoreduction to macroscopic residual disease ≤ 1 cm, and 10% had suboptimal cytoreduction with macroscopic disease > 1 cm.

There was also a statistical trend for the interaction between reactivation during REM sleep as compared to waking, with a destabilization of memories after reactivation during wakefulness but not during REM sleep [ F (1, 23) = 3.47, p = 0.08, η 2 = 0.13].

A statistical trend was defined as 0.05 < p < 0.10. 3.

Regression-based ANCOVA analysis, adjusted for body weight, indicated that this increase exceeds what would be expected from the higher body weight alone, although only a statistical trend was observed.

A 30% reduction in [MTX] brain/plasma was observed in response to TY-52156, a statistical trend (Supplementary Fig. 10 ).

This was also observed in the present dataset [11] although the effect of increased risk-taking was only a statistical trend.

Only in the dimension of openness to experience was a statistical trend noticed: with age the intensity of this trait increases.

Instead, ν mean conveys a statistical trend of the coefficients of the samples.

Additionally, there was a statistical trend toward a 3-way interaction of sex, virus, and ethanol [F (1,63) =3.74; p interaction =0.058].

Although as a statistical trend (contrasts survived uncorrected but not corrected thresholds), the oral contraceptive group’s activation upon expectation of erotic stimuli was reduced compared to mid-luteal nC subjects in two additional brain regions, the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC) and anterior middle cingulate cortex.

The SII in each group displayed a statistical trend consistent with that observed for Neu and Lym counts.

A P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant, and P- values between 0.05 and 0.10 represent a statistical trend.

However, considering the heterogeneity and applying a random-effects model, this difference reached only a statistical trend rather than robust significance.

While our finding for smartphone addiction only showed a statistical trend, the directionality mirrors that observed for social media addiction and may reflect a broader regulatory mechanism in the digital domain.

Formally, these associations may be even interpreted as a statistical trend towards an inverse correlation between 25(OH)D 3 serum levels and SVR after treatment with PEG-IFN-α and ribavirin.

P values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant, and P values between 0.05 and 0.1 were valued as a statistical trend.

A P -value <0.05 was considered significant, while values in the range of 0.10≥P≥0.05 were assumed to indicate a statistical trend.

BDNF increase appeared to be associated with the dimension of cognitive improvement, but this association was observed only at a statistical trend-level.

GRS APOE (OR = 1.94; CI = 1.38–2.72; p = 0.07) and pathway‐GRSs inflammation (OR = 1.28; CI = 1.01–2.62; p = 0.07) showed a statistical trend in these groups. 3.5.