Barely Significant
← all phrases

a strong trend

780 sentences · 780 papers · 7,242 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.077

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a strong trendp = .051.0× alphagold
In the data analyzed here, we did not observe any marked differences in effects when adding meditation status ( n = 6) as a covariate, but the shift in the NREM gamma band from a strong trend (uncorrected p = .05) to a significant effect in the regression analysis corrected for meditation status ( p .=011) indicated that meditation practice might indeed mask the strength of the effect in the NREM-gamma band.
a strong trendp = 0.05011.0× alphagold
In probe trials 1 and 2, performed at the end of hidden trial days 1 and 2, only sham mice for each of the genotypes showed preference for the target quadrant; a strong trend ( p = 0.0501) was observed in probe trial 2 for brain-injured syk f/f MRP8-cre + mice ( Supplemental Fig. 7B , C ).
a strong trendP = 0.05101.0× alphagold
Additionally, we found mediating effects of C-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CCL13) and endothelial monocyte-activating polypeptide II (EMAP-II) between OSA and HBP with the IVW-RE method; however, in the cML-MA-BIC method, the negative association between OSA and EMAP-II only showed a strong trend of statistical significance ( P = 0.0510), and the negative association between OSA and CCL13 approached statistical significance ( P = 0.0668).
a strong trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the subset MSSOpoly, differences, most of which were not statistically significant, could be obtained in onset symptoms and symptoms at the last visit, with a strong trend of a higher rate of walking impairments in MSSOpoly (68%) compared to MSS- (50%, p = 0.051). 58% of MSSOpoly were working at the last reported visit compared to 67% in MSS- ( p = 0.4).
a strong trendp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
In the second model of multivariable analysis, taking into account the use vs not-use of medical devices, a strong trend supporting a protective role for diabetes nearly reaching statistical significance was observed (OR 0.64, 95% C.I. 0.41–1.00, p = 0.051).
a strong trendP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Whereas we did not observe a significant difference in PFS [CHT: 3.0 months (95% CI 1.4-4.6 months) versus nCHT: 3.2 months (95% CI 2.8-3.6 months), P = 0.725], there was a strong trend towards longer OS in the CHT group [CHT: 15.5 months (95% CI 8.0-23.0 months) versus nCHT: 5.3 months (95% CI 0-12.5 months), P = 0.052] ( Figure 1 C).