Barely Significant
← all phrases

“an increasing trend”

63,972 sentences · 63,972 papers · 107,686 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendp < 0.051.0× alphagold
The results demonstrated that the expression levels of miR-204-3p, miR-204-5p, and miR-3955-5p were downregulated ( p < 0.05), whereas the expression levels of novel_996 showed an increasing trend ( p < 0.05) in high fecundity goats during the follicular phase (Fig. 5 A).
an increasing trendP < 0.051.0× alphagold
The 50% rainfall enhancement treatment significantly increased soil moisture, and the total carbon content showed an increasing trend with the increase in precipitation ( P < 0.05). pH was the most important explanatory factor for community structure, while total nitrogen content was the key explanatory factor for community diversity.
an increasing trendp<0.051.0× alphagold
As shown in Supplementary Figure S4 , we observed an increasing trend in the risk score in patients with pathological stage IV, and it was higher in the M1 stage compared to the M0 stage (p<0.05), suggesting that the risk score effectively reflects the severity of the disease, particularly in relation to features associated with distant metastasis.
an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
Similarly, significant linear increases in TG and HDL-C levels were recorded in the M group ( P < 0.05).Although LDL-C concentration exhibited an increasing trend across acetate-supplemented groups, the differences did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05).
an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of respiratory system, gastrointestinal system, circulatory system, nervous system complications and sepsis between smaller twins and larger twins in sFGR and MCDA-C twins, although an increasing trend of neonatal complications was observed in sFGR-S more than that in sFGR-L ( P > 0.05) (Table 2 ).
an increasing trendP > 0.051.0× alphagold
did not reach statistical significanceP > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
The results of subgroup analysis are shown in S3 Fig in S1 File : in subgroups such as mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, hypertension, diabetes, vasopressors, INR, and fresh frozen plasma, the mortality risk of the rapidly ascending RDW group (Traj1) was significantly higher than that of the stable low-level group (Traj0) ( P < 0.05); while in subgroups such as age, chronic kidney disease, and Hb, although the mortality risk of the Traj1 group showed an increasing trend, the difference in some subgroups did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05), which may be related to the limited statistical power of smaller subgroups and residual confounding.