“approaching borderline significance”

In group B, all the corneal front parameters were statistically significant, with K2 approaching borderline significance ( p = 0.049).

Clinicopathologically, hsa_circ_0001583 did not show statistically significant correlation with any feature, although it exhibited a weak correlation with the existence of MIBC, approaching borderline significance ( p = 0.0504) ( Table 1 ).

Specifically, anterior corneal flat keratometry (FK) values were 44.39 ± 1.43 D (WTR), 43.85 ± 1.42 D (ATR), and 44.18 ± 1.66 D (Oblique), approaching borderline significance ( P = 0.051).

Alterations in ATM were more frequent among H/L patients (17.3%) compared with NHW patients (7.9%), a difference approaching borderline significance ( p = 0.06).

For the other lncRNAs analyzed, a trend of increased abundance could be observed in advanced stages compared to early stages as well, with LINC02499 levels approaching borderline significance ( P = 0.063).

Residents who lived in the area for 20 years or more had slightly higher PCDD/Fs concentrations (3.23 pg WHO-TEQ/g lipid) than those who lived there for less than 20 years (2.63 pg WHO-TEQ/g lipid), with this difference approaching borderline significance (p < 0.07).

Furthermore, the proportion of mutations in metastatic branches was higher than in primary branches, approaching borderline significance ( p = 0.072, Fig. 3 H).

Moreover, stage IV was related to an early occurrence of the SCLC phenotype, approaching borderline significance (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.90 to 3.52; P = 0.098).

The only results approaching borderline significance concerned comparisons between averaged AI and poor health status in the overall GNKQ-R (P = .19), Section 1 (P = .07), and Section 4 (P = .10).

Similarly, an effect approaching borderline significance was also observed regarding TC elevation ( Figure 2 D). 2.4.

The adjusted odds ratio for combined death or disability was 1.00 (0.85-1.19), and for sICH, it was 0.87 (0.63-1.19), with lower mortality approaching borderline significance at 0.77 (0.59-1.01) [ 51 ].

Discussion In our review of 1372 propensity matched patients with T2DM presenting for elective, primary TJA, we found that the administration of DEX was associated with significantly increased POD 0, POD 1, and POD 2 mean and maximum blood glucose as well as increased odds of being hyperglycemic on POD 0, and the odds of being hyperglycemic on POD 1 approaching borderline significance.

In contrast, the LMR and the CALLY index did not show significant predictive effects for ACS (LMR coefficien t=−0 .268, O R= 0.765, 95% CI: 0.567–1.030, P= 0.078; CALLY coefficien t=−0 .223, O R= 0.800, 95% CI: 0.467–1.370, P= 0.416), with LMR approaching borderline significance.

3.16), approaching borderline significance.

4.2 months; p = 0.094), approaching borderline significance.

27.1%, RR 1.476, 95% CI 0.997–2.168, P = 0.049), with the latter approaching borderline significance.

However, we observed no between‐group differences in 24 out of 27 outcomes, with none approaching borderline significance ( p values ranging from 0.126 to 0.900).

In contrast, women displayed smaller effect sizes across domains, with CERAD Instant Recall (β = 0.04, P = 0.077) and Animal Fluency (β = 0.04, P = 0.095) approaching borderline significance, while CERAD Delayed Recall and DSST showed negligible associations.

This approach does not account for inter-eye correlation and may underestimate variance, potentially inflating statistical significance, particularly for outcomes approaching borderline significance.