Barely Significant
← all phrases

approaching significance

1,609 sentences · 1,609 papers · 3,275 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

approaching significancep = 0.0701.4× alphagold
In the univariate analysis, we observed that genes such as CDC20 (HR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.001–1.005, p = 0.001), ERCC6L (HR: 1.045, 95% CI: 1.013–1.077, p = 0.006), FAM136A (HR: 1.005, 95% CI: 1.000–1.010, p = 0.070, approaching significance), PLK1 (HR: 1.017, 95% CI: 1.009–1.024, p < 0.001), and UBE2T (HR: 1.005, 95% CI: 1.001–1.008, p = 0.010) were associated with the overall survival prognosis of LUAD.
approaching significancep < 0.071.4× alphagold
An ANOVA on the N1 AEP, with variables percept type, time-locking (onsets and offsets), and congruency, revealed a main effects of percept type approaching significance [ F (1, 11) = 4.1, p < 0.07, η p = 0.27], which was due to smaller N1 AEPs occurring for the illusion than the illusion-failure percept across congruency and time-locking conditions.
approaching significancep = 0.071.4× alphagold
fMRI data Contrast 1: Navigation from memory Analysis of the individual ROIs between groups revealed significantly greater activation of the right hippocampus [ t (24) = 2.77, p = 0.03], as shown in Figure 4 A, and the left parahippocampal gyrus [ t (24) = 2.81, p = 0.03], Figure 4 B, in the control group compared to the ketamine group for navigation from memory compared to walking to a visible object, with similar findings approaching significance in the right parahippocampal gyrus [ t (24) = 2.42, p = 0.07] and left caudate [ t (24) = 2.35, p = 0.08] (See Figure 4 ).
approaching significancep=0.071.4× alphagold
TLC (r= 0.01, p=0.89) and MNC (r=0.37, p=0.92) weakly correlated with CD34+cell yield while, TLC increment was moderately correlated approaching significance (r=0.58, p=0.07).
Poster Abstracts
Asian J Transfus Sci · 2025 · PMC12662610
approaching significanceP =0.071.4× alphagold
To independently confirm this, we performed a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on the TDA-identified subject subsets, confirming significant drug effects on MN sparing ( P =0.02) and tissue area at the epicentre ( P =0.002), with other outcomes approaching significance, including grooming at 28 days post lesion (DPL) ( P =0.07).