The correlation between the quadratic term CEB 2 and lifespan was large, negative and significant in three of four models (no covariates: r G = −1.09, P = 0.003, only mother identifier as random effect: r G = −1.73, P = 0.04, only education as random effect: r G = −0.85, P = 0.01), and borderline non-significant in the model with only the father identifier ( r G = −1.61, P = 0.06).
The values reflected for females was borderline non-significant (−0.11, CI −0.22–0.006, p = 0.06).
The model with time and the interaction intervention*time showed a borderline non-significant relationship between VR+ on the achievement of work participation on discharge: OR 1.8 (CI 1.0–3.4), p = 0.06, and a significant relationship on 6-months follow-up: OR = 1.8 (CI 1.1–2.8), p = 0.01.
Using obese individuals as the reference group, normal weight individuals demonstrated a borderline non-significant trend for weight gain (2.6 kg, SE = 1.4, p = 0.06) and overweight individuals had a significant weight gain (2.6 kg, SE = 1.1, p = 0.02).
In the partially adjusted model, there was a borderline non-significant 31.2% (−1.7% to 75.0%, P=0.06) higher rate of mass shootings.
Nevertheless, multivariable analysis revealed borderline non-significant relations between insulin-treatment and TLF (p = 0.06) and between patient age and MACE (p = 0.06).
Unadjusted results (Model 1) showed that consumption of ≥400 g/day of fruit and/or vegetables was associated with a borderline non-significant decrease of incident HCC by 59% (relative risk [RR] = 0.41, 95% CI [0.17; 1.03], p = 0.06) ( Table 3 ).
Regarded individually, only the PIFR factor has a significant influence on the response with a p-value equal to 0.001 ( Table 3 ) , while the coefficient of Ti is borderline non-significant ( p = 0.06) ( Table 3 ) .
Compared to restrictive procedures, foregut bypass resulted in a borderline non-significant decrease in fibrosis score (P=0.06) and significantly lower steatosis score (P<0.001).
For overall IBD, the continuous LC9 score was significantly associated with reduced IBD risk in Models 1 and 2 (Model 1: HR 0.956, 95% CI 0.934–0.979, P < 0.001; Model 2: HR 0.960, 95% CI 0.937–0.983, P = 0.001), while the association in Model 3 was attenuated and borderline non-significant (HR 0.976, 95% CI 0.953–1.001, P = 0.060).
There was a borderline non-significant ( p = 0.06) fall in ACTH concentrations.
Another possible explanation has to do with the discovery cohorts consisting only of men, whereas women made up 88% of the replication samples, with the one male replication set showing a borderline non-significant association ( P = 0.06).
The influence of rs776746 (CYP3A5*3) on the achievement of a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6 months was borderline non-significant ( p = 0.06).
4 a), whereas the U-AAP-sul/U-AAP ratio showed a borderline non-significant decrease with age ( n = 24, R 2 = 0.150, p = 0.06) (Fig. 4 b).
Pancreatic cancer was found to have a borderline non-significant association with the study outcomes (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 0.97–4.02; P = .060).
The meta-analysis of the in vivo studies indicated that calcium-hydroxide powder/saline promotes reparative bridge formation better than the popular commercial resin-free calcium-silicate cement Pro-Root MTA (Dentsply-Sirona), although the difference was borderline non-significant ( p = 0.06), and better than calcium-hydroxide cements ( p < 0.0001).
A higher total 25(OH)D remained associated with fasting glucose ( β = −0.5, p = 0.008) but was no longer associated with 1 h or 2 h glucose post-OGTT, although the results were borderline non-significant ( p = 0.06 and p = 0.07, respectively).
Interpretation of Regression Models 4.1 Knowledge Model The overall model is borderline non-significant (F(3,187) = 2.52, p = 0.060), with R2 = 0.04. • The model explains only 4% of the variance. • Despite this, sex is interpreted as a meaningful predictor.
A second RCT explored differences in effect according to whether participation was as an individual or as a couple (randomisation by household), finding a borderline non-significant result ( p < 0.06, greater effect in those participating as a couple) at 3-month follow-up [ 48 ].
Calcium/Cr, the pre- and post-supplementation differences were only borderline non-significant (0.44 ± 0.31 vs. 0.51 ± 0.33 mmol/mmol; p = 0.06); however, when analyzed in subgroups according to the baseline urinary calcium excretion, we found a significant increase for those with a baseline U.
At specific time points, the 5-year survival rate showed a borderline non-significant trend favoring first KT recipients (OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.97–2.73, P = .06), while the 10-year survival rate showed no difference (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.67–1.32, P = .71).
In the RCA, there was a borderline non-significant trend between statin use and lower FAI among MWoH, with an estimated difference of −2.17 HU (−4.40, 0.06); P = 0.06).
Statin use was a borderline non-significant protective factor for CRC in the MCC-study in the multivariate analysis (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.70–1.01, p = 0.060, Table 1 ).
Although there was a trend for smaller recrudescence under higher drug doses, this effect was borderline non-significant (F 2,35 = 3.05, p = 0.061), and there was no significant interaction between drug dose and parasite line (F 2,32 = 0.046, p = 0.96; figure 2c ).
Regarding the composite endpoint, diastolic VTI exhibited a borderline non-significant trend toward an increased risk (HR = 1.43; 95% CI: 0.98–2.08; p = 0.061), suggesting that its prognostic contribution remains limited in our study population ( Table 5 ).