Western blot analysis further verified lower expression of SDPR in B TM compared to W TM (p < 0.0001) with borderline significance of reduced expression of CAV1 in B TM (p = 0.0654, Fig. 3 c,d), though no racial difference was detected in CAV1 immunohistochemistry staining.
As for tomographic outcome, the minor allele homozygotes for ARMS2 rs10490924 and HTRA1 rs1100638 (GG genotype for both) were associated with a larger CSMT reduction at month 12 than other genotypes, with borderline significance after Bonferroni correction (118.6 ± 132.7 μm versus 62.7 ± 89.7 μm, corrected p = 0.0656 for rs10490924; 115.7 ± 131.7 μm versus 63.6 ± 89.8 μm, corrected p = 0.0528 for rs11200638).
Nevertheless, given the availability of only three RCTs available for subgroup analysis and as well as the moderate effect size regarding the sustained therapeutic effects for inattention (ES: 0.57) with borderline significance ( p = 0.0657), our result was still in favor of a better sustained effect of the combined approach than medication alone, especially for the symptoms of inattention.
After excluding patients from the analysis with ECMO/HTX, WCD use resulted in a borderline significance for fewer total lengths of hospitalization (10.4 ± 7.2 vs. 12.4 ± 15.2 days, p = 0.066), compared with the no-WCD group.
The mean post-operative ICP was not statistically significant difference between 2 groups, but had borderline significance ( p =0.066).
The difference between minoxidil 5% and dexpanthenol or SSD ointments showed a borderline significance (p = 0.066 and p = 0.051 for BVN and p = 0.069 and p = 0.053 for BVD).
In the CD8 + compartment, an increase was observed in the median frequencies of cytokine positive cells compared with prebooster, but this difference only reached a borderline significance for IL-2 ( P = .066).
Changes in CVP (Delta-CVP) were independently associated to Delta-GEDVI (p = 0.044; T = 2.03) and - with borderline significance - to Delta-mP aw (p = 0.066; T = 1.857), but not to Delta-IAP, Delta-EVLWI or Delta-CI.
In the pleurodesis group patients (n = 89), apex-to-cupola distance > 10 mm at POD0–3 showed no significance (83.3% vs 51.8%, P = 0.212) and at POD4–14 only borderline significance (66.7% vs 27.7%, P = 0.066) to postoperative recurrence of PSP.
18%; RR = 1.26; P = 0.042), and of a borderline significance for overall survival (HR = 1.11; P = 0.066).
The level of circulating Lin28B had a significant association with high BCLC stage (stage B to C diseases versus A1 to A4 diseases) (P=0.022) ( Figure S6A ) and had a borderline significance in associated with high AJCC stage (stage IIIC to IVA diseases versus I to IIIB diseases) (P=0.066) ( Figure S6B ).
Although there was no group showing a statistically significant trend in the 'smoking rate of more than 10 cigarettes a day', the male students in rural areas showed an increasing trend at a borderline significance level from 3.1% in 2005 to 6.2% in 2008 and to 5.3% in 2009 (p=0.070), and the male students in small towns showed a decreasing trend at a borderline significance level from 2.7% in 2005 to 4.8% in 2006 and to 3.8% in 2009 (p=0.066).
The correlation of leptin level with BMI had only borderline significance ( r = 0.239, P = 0.066) when analyzed in the patients and Co as whole ( n = 60).
64.3%, P = 0.040) and received chemotherapy with a borderline significance (91.3 vs. 72.9%, P = 0.066) in the PMRT subgroup than in the no PMRT subgroup.
For HA, the %PB was increased with a borderline significance ( p = 0.066).
Lack of response to ruxolitinib was associated with increased hazard with borderline significance (HR 2.64, 95% CI 0.94–7.42, p = 0.066), whereas age was not significant (HR 0.98 per year, 95% CI 0.95–1.02, p = 0.319).
In Supplementary Table 3, some findings showed borderline significance, such as the risk of goiter in women aged 40–49 after hysterectomy (HR 1.229, 95% CI 0.987–1.532, P = 0.066).
Patients with lacunes and LAD were significantly more likely to die ( P <0.001 both), but the association between WMH and all‐cause death showed borderline significance ( P =0.066).
However, there was no statistically significant difference in the subgroup analysis of RCTs alone (OR: 0.788, 95% CI: 0.589–1.054, p = 0.108), whereas borderline significance was noted when analyzing balanced studies alone (OR: 0.802, 95% CI: 0.634–1.015, p = 0.066).
Of note, the benefit of LCTs in terms of OS and PFS in patients with colorectal cancer showed borderline significance in the pooled analyses ( p = 0.066 and 0.055, respectively).
In T1DM, 1‐year mortality showed borderline significance between SGLT2 users and non‐users (0% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.066), although the small number of SGLT2‐treated T1DM patients limits interpretation. 3.4.
The earlier finding that cigarette smoking was negatively associated with Se [ 65 ] was observed in this study but at borderline significance (B = −0.05, p = 0.066), possibly due to the relatively low statistical power. 4.3.
The effect of PTV on DPFS was significant in the 18 months after SBRT, where each twofold increase in total PTV increased the risk of distant progression by 40.6% (95% CI: 28.1–54.3%, p <0.0001) in the first 6 months, by 11.6% with borderline significance during months 6–12 (95% CI: −0.7–25.4%, p = 0.066), and by 18.2% in months 12–18 (95% CI: 2.2–36.7%, p = 0.024).
LITP1 was negatively associated with T stage (R = -0.2, P = 0.027), N stage (R = -0.16, P = 0.066, borderline significance), grade (R = -0.31, P = 0.001), ki67 (R = -0.28, P = 0.002), and HER2 levels (R = -0.32, P = 0.0004).
Nevertheless, when we relaxed the P -value cut-off in the training dataset to 0.5, the Swedish ER-positive breast cancer target dataset showed borderline significance for a shared polygenic component with ER-positive breast cancer, based on the Finnish ER-positive training dataset (Figure 10a , P = 0.066).