Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significance

1,672 sentences · 1,672 papers · 11,068 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep=0.051.0× alpha
Specifically, there were no differences in the occurrence of SGA and LGA, at birth, and no differences in weight, BMI, BMI z-scores or measures of adiposity (sum of four skinfold and/or BIA) at birth, 6-8 weeks or one year, except for birth length, which was lower in the intervention group compared to the usual-care group, but only in the adjusted analyses did it reach borderline significance levels (p=0.05). 3.3 Psychobehavioral outcomes In the overall offspring population, the mean Parenting Stress Index was 22.38, the mean night-time sleep duration was 639 minutes/night with a mean of 1.22 awakenings/night and 5% of mothers perceived their child’s sleep as “a very serious problem” ( Table 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Pre-op LVEF was associated with the risk of post-op respiratory failure (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96–0.99, p = 0.01), whereas pre-op pulmonary hypertension showed borderline significance as a predictive factor (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.98–4.09, p = 0.05). - Wound dehiscence and delirium Our logistic regression analysis revealed obesity was not a risk factor for either wound dehiscence or delirium (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: [0.885–3.336], p = 0.11; OR: 1.03, 95% CI: [0.34–3.13], p = 0.95, respectively).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Overall, PNP and NNP patients had a median of 5 neurologic manifestations or symptoms attributed to PASC, with significant age-related differences in PNP patients (median [IQR] number of symptoms: younger 6 [4–8], middle-age 5 [3–7], older 4 [2–6]; p = 0.001) and borderline significance in NNP patients (median [IQR] number of symptoms: younger 5 [3–7], middle-age 5 [3–7], older 4 [3–6]; p = 0.05), reflecting a lower number of neurologic symptoms in older patients.
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
A linear regression analysis suggested that there was only a marginal effect of the proportion of EZH2-expressing tumor cells on the crude disease-free survival of young patients, with borderline significance (F(1,66) = 3.95, p = 0.05, with an R 2 = 0.06 and a regression coefficient of −0.4); thus, the one percent increase in the proportion of EZH2-expressing cells might be related to a 0.4-month decrease in the predicted DFS with great scatter in the data.
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Nevertheless, patients with fHP tended to show precipitin positivity against avian antigens more often than those with non-fHP with borderline significance (56.1 vs. 27.8%, respectively, p = 0.05) Reported exposure to birds’ antigens correlated well with the positive serum-specific G immunoglobulins (ssIgGs) against avian antigens (Spearman’s corr. coeff. 0.342, p < 0.05), whereas there was no correlation between the reported farming exposure and the presence of precipitins to thermophilic actinomycetes.
borderline significanceP = 0.051.0× alpha
The score summarizing variants unrelated to complement or lipid metabolism was higher in AMD (mean ± SD = 0.03 ± 0.02) compared with AFVD (mean ± SD = −0.15 ± 0.05, P = 0.004), and showed a borderline significance level for being lower in AFVD compared with controls (mean ± SD = −0.02 ± 0.05, P = 0.05; Fig. 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
There was borderline significance within‐sample variance for Bray–Curtis dissimilarity by location ( F = 2.05, p = 0.05) and significant within‐sample variance when comparing by cohort ( F = 7.37, p = 9.00e‐3), but not sex ( F = 0.06, p = 0.80) suggesting that significant results may be driven by within‐group variation by cohort and individual locations.
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
For the secondary outcomes, there were significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (−0.22 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.39 to −0.04; p = 0.01; I 2 = 94%) and fasting insulin levels (−3.36 μIU/mL; 95% CI: −6.31 to −0.41; p = 0.03; I 2 = 97%), while a borderline significance in HOMA‐IR scores (−0.56; 95% CI: −1.12 to −0.01; p = 0.05; I 2 = 96%) but no significant differences in 2‐h OGTT or HbA 1 c measures.