borderline significanceP = 0.050
The prevalence of hypertension was notably higher in the DAPT group (89.10%) compared to the ASA group (80.80%), with a borderline significance ( P = 0.050).
The prevalence of hypertension was notably higher in the DAPT group (89.10%) compared to the ASA group (80.80%), with a borderline significance ( P = 0.050).
The education level exhibits borderline significance (p=0.05), suggesting a potential weak correlation, as people possessing a diploma or secondary education demonstrate marginally elevated mean values relative to those with higher educational attainment.
After dividing the patients based on whether they were older than 50, the results showed borderline significance in older patients ( P =0.050).
A shorter TSD was associated with increased node positivity with a borderline significance ( p = 0.05).
Logistic regression analysis showed no baseline factor was statistically significantly associated with GH cessation, except female gender which had a borderline significance (P = 0.05).
The pasting temperatures did not significantly differ between WRM and WRM:WF (borderline significance, p = 0.05), indicating that from 50% of whole rye meal, the pasting temperature of the blends remained more or less the same.
Specifically, there were no differences in the occurrence of SGA and LGA, at birth, and no differences in weight, BMI, BMI z-scores or measures of adiposity (sum of four skinfold and/or BIA) at birth, 6-8 weeks or one year, except for birth length, which was lower in the intervention group compared to the usual-care group, but only in the adjusted analyses did it reach borderline significance levels (p=0.05). 3.3 Psychobehavioral outcomes In the overall offspring population, the mean Parenting Stress Index was 22.38, the mean night-time sleep duration was 639 minutes/night with a mean of 1.22 awakenings/night and 5% of mothers perceived their child’s sleep as “a very serious problem” ( Table 2 ).
Specifically, GLS exhibited a decrease during chemotherapy compared to the baseline, demonstrating borderline significance 18.5±2.3 versus -19.6±1.6 (p=0.05).
However, in a meta-analysis of 17,330 participants for periodontal disease and carotid atherosclerosis, subgroup analysis of adjusted DM showed only borderline significance (OR: 1.08; 95% CI [1.00–1.18]; p = 0.05) ( Whayne, 2017 ), making the relationship even more confusing.
Pre-op LVEF was associated with the risk of post-op respiratory failure (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.96–0.99, p = 0.01), whereas pre-op pulmonary hypertension showed borderline significance as a predictive factor (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.98–4.09, p = 0.05). - Wound dehiscence and delirium Our logistic regression analysis revealed obesity was not a risk factor for either wound dehiscence or delirium (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: [0.885–3.336], p = 0.11; OR: 1.03, 95% CI: [0.34–3.13], p = 0.95, respectively).
Overall, PNP and NNP patients had a median of 5 neurologic manifestations or symptoms attributed to PASC, with significant age-related differences in PNP patients (median [IQR] number of symptoms: younger 6 [4–8], middle-age 5 [3–7], older 4 [2–6]; p = 0.001) and borderline significance in NNP patients (median [IQR] number of symptoms: younger 5 [3–7], middle-age 5 [3–7], older 4 [3–6]; p = 0.05), reflecting a lower number of neurologic symptoms in older patients.
Patients who had not received (β = 1.05) or who completed RT (β = 1.08), showed a better SumSc score compared to those who were receiving RT, but with a borderline significance ( p = 0.05) ( Table 5 ). 4.
However, there was a borderline significance increase in IDegAsp requirement for the whole group at the two-year follow-up ( p = 0.05).
A linear regression analysis suggested that there was only a marginal effect of the proportion of EZH2-expressing tumor cells on the crude disease-free survival of young patients, with borderline significance (F(1,66) = 3.95, p = 0.05, with an R 2 = 0.06 and a regression coefficient of −0.4); thus, the one percent increase in the proportion of EZH2-expressing cells might be related to a 0.4-month decrease in the predicted DFS with great scatter in the data.
The delivery mode required further validation despite its borderline significance ( P = 0.05).
The UACR exerted borderline significance for this dependent variable (OP = 1.04; p = 0.050). 3.6.
Borderline significance was found in the intensity condition between speakers of Hebrew ( M = 0.54) and German ( M = 0.64; p = 0.05).
-7.5±2.9 o ; p=0.03), with the delta of this parameter showing a borderline significance (p=0.05) between groups.
Nevertheless, patients with fHP tended to show precipitin positivity against avian antigens more often than those with non-fHP with borderline significance (56.1 vs. 27.8%, respectively, p = 0.05) Reported exposure to birds’ antigens correlated well with the positive serum-specific G immunoglobulins (ssIgGs) against avian antigens (Spearman’s corr. coeff. 0.342, p < 0.05), whereas there was no correlation between the reported farming exposure and the presence of precipitins to thermophilic actinomycetes.
In the SEER database, borderline significance for OS was observed ( P = 0.050) (Fig.
All cases of overt hyperthyroidism in the entire sample (p = 0.002) and in women (p = 0.01) and men (with borderline significance, p = 0.05) are concentrated in the age strata of 35-44 years.
The score summarizing variants unrelated to complement or lipid metabolism was higher in AMD (mean ± SD = 0.03 ± 0.02) compared with AFVD (mean ± SD = −0.15 ± 0.05, P = 0.004), and showed a borderline significance level for being lower in AFVD compared with controls (mean ± SD = −0.02 ± 0.05, P = 0.05; Fig. 2 ).
Anxiety scores (HADS-Anxiety) showed a trend toward improvement in the intervention group, reaching borderline significance at T48 ( p = 0.05).
There was borderline significance within‐sample variance for Bray–Curtis dissimilarity by location ( F = 2.05, p = 0.05) and significant within‐sample variance when comparing by cohort ( F = 7.37, p = 9.00e‐3), but not sex ( F = 0.06, p = 0.80) suggesting that significant results may be driven by within‐group variation by cohort and individual locations.
For the secondary outcomes, there were significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose (−0.22 mmol/L; 95% CI: −0.39 to −0.04; p = 0.01; I 2 = 94%) and fasting insulin levels (−3.36 μIU/mL; 95% CI: −6.31 to −0.41; p = 0.03; I 2 = 97%), while a borderline significance in HOMA‐IR scores (−0.56; 95% CI: −1.12 to −0.01; p = 0.05; I 2 = 96%) but no significant differences in 2‐h OGTT or HbA 1 c measures.