Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significance

7,018 sentences · 7,018 papers · 11,270 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
On the other hand, there was a statistically significant decrease among the LSA-responders to ESAT6:CFP10 (from 758.5 ± 731 to 231.2 ± 240.1 pg/mL, p = 0.027) as well as to PstS1 (285-374) :CFP10 (from 588.6 ± 650.0 to 106.7 ± 288.4 pg/mL, p = 0.004), albeit with a borderline significance relative to the full PstS1/CFP10 combination (from 469.2 ± 306.8 and 28.0 ± 45.7 pg/mL, p = 0.06).
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Primary endpoint The meta-analysis of pooled hazard ratios in all trials, including a total of 1789 patients, showed that all-cause mortality in the ICD group decreased with borderline significance (167 of 886 patients, i.e. 19%) in comparison to optimal pharmacological treatment (195 of 895 patients, i.e. 22%), with a HR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.67–0.10); p = 0.06; heterogeneity p = 0.78; I 2 = 0% ( Fig. 2 ).
borderline significanceP = 0.061.2× alpha
Consistently, the tumor-bearing mice living in the EE conditions showed decreased trend of anxiety-like behaviors with borderline significance (time in open arm: SE = 50.1 ± 10.8 s, EE = 79.2 ± 10.3 s, P = 0.06; percentage of distance travelled in open arm: SE = 7.9 ± 1.3%, EE = 12.1 ± 1.7%, P = 0.07) ( Figure 1D ).
borderline significanceP=0.061.2× alpha
In the IPF-OSA group S100A9 levels were also correlated with indices of OSA severity ( Table SIII ), including TST90 (r=0.34, P=0.03) and with a borderline significance after adjustments for obesity, smoking and GAP index (β=0.015, P=0.06), ODI (r=0.36, P=0.023) which persisted after adjustments for obesity, smoking and GAP index (β=0.013, P=0.02), and nocturnal mean SaO 2 (r=-0.32, P=0.04), but this correlation disappeared after adjustments for obesity, smoking and GAP index.
borderline significanceP ≈ 0.061.2× alpha
Between-group comparisons showed greater numerical changes in the adjuvant group for feeding ( P = .036), bathing ( P = .024), dressing ( P = .020), grooming ( P = .032), toilet use ( P = .016), mobility ( P = .010), transfers ( P = .012), stair climbing ( P = .008), and borderline significance in continence items ( P ≈ 0.06).
borderline significancep = 0.061.2× alpha
Women in Poland and Greece appeared less likely, while women in Ireland were more likely, to meet the WHO PA recommendations (borderline significance: p = 0.06 and p = 0.1, respectively; Fig 2 and S2 Table ). 30 min · d −1 PA recommendation When PA guidelines were defined as at least 3 0 min · d −1 of MVPA [ 5 ], prevalence estimates of meeting these guidelines were lower and ranged from 27.1% (Greece) to 46% (UK) for men and from 10.4% (Greece) to 25.6% (Ireland) for women.