Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significant

2,690 sentences · 2,690 papers · 13,524 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
During almost 20 years of follow-up across all IJD categories, OI occurred more often in RA (17.9%) than PsA (12.6%) or AS patients (13.3%) ( p = 0.002) with a significantly higher overall OI incidence rate in RA patients than in PsA and AS patients (both p < 0.01) while the rate difference between PsA and AS was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
In the unadjusted comparison of outcomes between the IMN and ORIF pairs, there were no statistically significant differences, although the greater prevalence of revisions in the ORIF cohort was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Performing a multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression with sex and age, sex proved to be an independent variable (HR 2.45; 95% CI 1.63–3.70; p < 0.001), whereas age was borderline significant (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77–1.001; p = 0.050).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
There was a borderline significant protective effect observed in the dominant Caucasian model (OR = 0.65, p = 0.05), with no heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%), indicating that the studies were consistent in their findings. 3.1.2 Soluble RAGE The secreted isoform of RAGE, termed soluble RAGE (sRAGE) was found to be released from cells to bind to RAGE ligands without stimulating intracellular signal transduction.
borderline significantp=0.051.0× alphagold
Correlations of hypoglycemic events and overall glucose control We observed a negative correlation between eHbA1c and total daily and mild hypoglycemic events (r=−0.57 and r=−0.66, respectively, p<0.0001), while for serious hypoglycemic events there was a borderline significant correlation (r=−0.13, p=0.05) ( figure 3 ).
borderline significantP =0.051.0× alphagold
Shown in Figure 2 , meta‐analysis of dichotomous cerebrovascular reactivity revealed a borderline significant association between an impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and an increased prevalence of cSVD (dichotomous predictor pooled OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.99–5.14], P =0.05).
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).