“borderline significant”

During almost 20 years of follow-up across all IJD categories, OI occurred more often in RA (17.9%) than PsA (12.6%) or AS patients (13.3%) ( p = 0.002) with a significantly higher overall OI incidence rate in RA patients than in PsA and AS patients (both p < 0.01) while the rate difference between PsA and AS was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).

ADHD diagnosis was borderline significant (OR = 1.19, p = 0.050, CI 95% [1.00, 1.42]).

In that study the risk was borderline significant for skin melanomas among BRCA2 carriers (6 observed, 2.3 expected); p = 0.05).

Acute lower respiratory symptoms were associated with lower CCL17 [estimate: 0.6 pg/ml, (95% CI: 0.5–0.8), p < 0.001] and a borderline significant lower level of CCL20 [estimate: 0.5 pg/ml (95% CI: 0.2–1.0), p = 0.05] ( Table 4 ).

In our study, a higher percentage of children with normal ALT levels had good general condition upon admission compared to children with elevated ALT (borderline significant): 26% of children with normal ALT levels were found in good general condition vs. 8.3% in the group with elevated ALT levels, p = 0.05.

In the Gem treated group of patients, TNM stage and DPD expression levels were both independent parameters for survival (with P=0.018 and P=0.036, respectively), whereas sex was borderline significant (P=0.050, Table III ).

Similarly, borderline significant differences were found across samples for aggregate scores [ F (6,1592) = 2.12, p = 0.05].

Excluding the patients that had no measurable CTCs, there was a borderline significant difference between median CTC count in the patients that did and that did not have HER2-positive CTCs ( p = 0.05, Mann–Whitney U test).

In the unadjusted comparison of outcomes between the IMN and ORIF pairs, there were no statistically significant differences, although the greater prevalence of revisions in the ORIF cohort was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).

In addition, acupuncture provided borderline significant reduction in the WOMAC pain subscale (range 0–20) at the end of the treatment (MD − 1.2, 95%CI − 2.3 to 0.0, p = 0.05) and at 9 months (MD − 1.4, 95%CI − 2.7 to 0.0, p = 0.05) post-treatment.

The main result for the primary outcome is borderline significant (RR=0.85 [0.72-1.00], p=0.05), it is difficult to interpret this result.

Items that showed significant or borderline significant association with abortion (p< 0.05 and p<0.1, respectively) were put into multivariate analysis.

Seeking professional help to reach climbing goals was borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

27.4 cm) than in the impaired development group, but this difference was only borderline significant ( P= 0.05) in this cohort.

GSR (average) for cases is higher when compared to controls and was borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

On the contrary, HbA 1c slightly increased in youth with type 1 diabetes in one study [ 25 ], both in the coping skills training group and in the control one (with no difference between the two), but this variation was only borderline significant ( P =.05).

The parameter B was negatively associated with PFS, with a coefficient of -0.26 and a hazard ratio of 0.773, although the p-value was borderline significant (p< 0.05).

With the exception of the social functioning subscale, which indicated a borderline significant increase in the intervention group at week 12 with a score of 0 (0, 12.5) compared to the control group's −12.5 (−12.5, 12.5) ( p = 0.05), no significant differences in QOL scores were observed between the two groups during the follow‐up phase relative to the pre‐treatment phase.

There was a borderline significant association between adjuvant chemotherapy and delay in stoma closure (median 4 vs. 6 months; p = 0.05), although a multi-variate analysis incorporating these two predictors did not reveal either as independent risk factors.

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).

A borderline significant difference in survival was observed for patients with localised cancer stage ( p = 0.05).

Age was a borderline significant predictor ( p = 0.05).

However, this reduction was borderline significant in the group with more than 12 sessions ( P =0.05).

This also appeared to be the case for women with a family history of breast cancer; however, the association was only borderline significant (OR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.76-1.00], p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).