“borderline significant”

The preprocedure HV distance was 98 ± 10.55ms in the group with permanent pacemaker implantation and the mean value in the group without permanent pacemaker implantation was 66.27 ± 15.55 ms, showing a borderline significant difference (p = 0.049).

Quality of life functional scales showed a borderline significant result for mental functioning domain was found in favor of the control group ( p = 0.049).

There was a borderline significant difference between the i-autism group and the i-ADHD group on the Social Awareness subscale ( p = 0.049) (see Table 3 ).

There was, however, a borderline significant sex difference between the two groups, with 73.0% male patients in the tirofiban group and 51.2% male patients in the control group ( P = 0.049).

Among women, there was a borderline significant decrease in 2020 in the age group 40–65 years (214 per 100,000; PI 215–273; p = 0.0491) (see Fig. 2 , fourth row).

Borderline significant differences in the two groups resulted also for gender ( p = 0.0495) ( Table 2 ).

Whereas female neutered dogs more often had scMCTs than cMCT (94/299, 31.4% versus 301/1241, 24.2%) male intact dogs more often had cMCTs (503/1541, 32.6% versus 84/299, 28.1%) but the difference was only borderline significant ( P = 0.0495).

Although differences in HHS between the cemented and uncemented groups at six weeks were not statistically significant ( p = 0.2112), WOMAC scores demonstrated a borderline significant difference favoring the cemented group ( p = 0.0496), suggesting a potential early functional benefit associated with cemented fixation ( Table 2 ). 3.9.

When comparing the results between the younger and older adults who received the same vaccine, there were no significant differences in the number of omicron-reactive IFNγ + CD4 + and IFNγ + CD8 + T cells in response to the spike or S/M/N/E peptide pool, except for in younger adults who received CoronaVac, who showed a higher number of CD4 + IFNγ + T cells using S/M/N/E peptide pool for stimulation, which was borderline significant (p=0·0498; appendix p 17 ).

There was a significant difference in the pre- and postoperative changes in anxiety and borderline significant ( p = 0.0499) changes in pain scores across the three surgical modalities.

The difference in TEP levels after the second cycle of chemotherapy was borderline significant ( p = 0.0499; 52.1 ± 14.8 (20–76) vs. 81.8 ± 39.2 (34–146) ( Figure 2 ). 3.4.

Relative to controls, patients with asthma had an increased risk of hospitalization for COVID-19 (fully adjusted hazard ratio=1.33; 95% CI=1.08–1.64; p=0.01) and borderline significant (p=0.05) higher rates of ICU admissions in the pre-delta period but not during the delta or Omicron periods.

Lastly, the authors also observed a borderline significant increase in median IBD-Q in the low-FODMAP diet group ( p = 0.05) with no change in the standard diet group [ 50 ].

2 d, p = 0.03) and a borderline significant correlation for MP (p = 0.05).

Correlations of hypoglycemic events and overall glucose control We observed a negative correlation between eHbA1c and total daily and mild hypoglycemic events (r=−0.57 and r=−0.66, respectively, p<0.0001), while for serious hypoglycemic events there was a borderline significant correlation (r=−0.13, p=0.05) ( figure 3 ).

oceanica study (all p = 0.030) and borderline significant in study with C. vulgaris (all p = 0.050–0.051).

Gender showed a borderline significant association, with females having half the odds of sleep insufficiency compared to males (OR = 0.5, 95% CI (0.3-1.0), p = 0.05).

Within macula-on patients, there was a borderline significant increase over time (0.011 [0.00005; 0.022], p = 0.050).

Similarly, we found a borderline significant association between psychological ULL scores and DASH scores ( p = 0.05), but not with ΔVolume ( Figures 1 E,H, respectively).

During almost 20 years of follow-up across all IJD categories, OI occurred more often in RA (17.9%) than PsA (12.6%) or AS patients (13.3%) ( p = 0.002) with a significantly higher overall OI incidence rate in RA patients than in PsA and AS patients (both p < 0.01) while the rate difference between PsA and AS was borderline significant ( p = 0.05) (Table 2 ).

Shown in Figure 2 , meta‐analysis of dichotomous cerebrovascular reactivity revealed a borderline significant association between an impaired cerebrovascular reactivity and an increased prevalence of cSVD (dichotomous predictor pooled OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 0.99–5.14], P =0.05).

Age was significantly positively correlated with ED values of the normal marrow cavity of P1 with DBSCT (Philips) ( p = 0.027, r = 0.36), and the correlation was borderline significant with SSDECT (Canon) ( p = 0.05, r = 0.33).

There was a significant decrease in the reporting of neonatal sepsis ( p = 0.01) in the bivariate analysis, which remained only borderline significant in the multivariate model ( p = 0.05).

This score showed a borderline significant difference between patients with AFVD (mean ± SD = 0.95 ± 0.12) and controls ( P = 0.05).

There was a borderline significant difference between pre‐presentation and comparison intention to complete the test ( p = 0.05), with 66% intending to do so in the intervention group and 79% in the comparison group.