Correlations of hypoglycemic events and overall glucose control We observed a negative correlation between eHbA1c and total daily and mild hypoglycemic events (r=−0.57 and r=−0.66, respectively, p<0.0001), while for serious hypoglycemic events there was a borderline significant correlation (r=−0.13, p=0.05) ( figure 3 ).
← all phrases
“borderline significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
Otherwise, we examined univariate analysis results. To eliminate the impact of the borderline significant results, we considered P≤0.05 as significant (not P=0.051).
Although sex was borderline significant ( p = 0.050), it is noteworthy that all three observed deaths occurred in female patients, and the limited number of events restricts the interpretability of this finding.
For NEUTs, a borderline significant decrease was observed between points II and III ( p = 0.05).
7 ): Continuous aerobic exercise (5 studies, n =142) showed a borderline significant reduction (pooled SMD = -0.35, 95% CI: -0.69 to-0.01; Z = 1.99, P = 0.05) with negligible heterogeneity (I2= 0%).
Remote healthcare access was a borderline significant factor (AOR 1.28; p = 0.05).
For agility, the effect size was borderline significant (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI [0.00, 1.30], p = 0.05), suggesting only a possible positive trend.
Similarly, we found a borderline significant association between psychological ULL scores and DASH scores ( p = 0.05), but not with ΔVolume ( Figures 1 E,H, respectively).
However, higher cIMT at baseline had a borderline significant association with higher LVDF at follow-up ( p = 0.05). 3.4.
no significant difference between first responders that participated in special operations or non-special operations regarding the importance of health monitoring preferences; (6) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and cortisol levels (stress) ( p = 0.02) and a borderline significant association between age group of the respondent and skin resistance ( p = 0.05); (7) there was a significant association between special operations and biological proteins ( p = 0.03); and (8) there was a significant association between age group of the respondent and carbon dioxide ( p = 0.03).
Regression analysis The univariable linear regression tests between AUC of post-meal SBP and age, BMI, sex, supine SBP, sinus arrhythmia ratio, the index ∆HR/∆BP and HR during phase IV of VM did not show any significant association, Table 3 ; however, the diagnosis (MSA or PD) had a borderline significant association with AUC of post-meal SBP ( P = 0.05).
Nerinetide showed a borderline significant mortality reduction versus placebo (RR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.75–1.00; p = 0.05) with low heterogeneity ( I 2 = 11%).
For RNFL thickness, the adjusted effect was borderline significant ( p ≈ 0.05).
Race interaction: borderline significant (overall p = 0.05).
In the parsimonious model, HPV18 positivity remained borderline significant (adjusted OR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.00–16.97; p = 0.050.
GSR (average) for cases is higher when compared to controls and was borderline significant ( P = 0.05).
Statistical T Tests were conducted and the results show that there is a borderline significant difference between the average Weighted F1-scores of EEGNet and LSTM-EEGNet, which has t(5)=2.029; p-value=0.050 with .
A borderline significant association was found with those who have shorter incarcerated period and clustering (21 vs. 14 days; OR = 1.01 [95% CI: 1–1.01], P = 0.05; Table 3 ) while receiving income assistance (e.g., disability check, military, TANF, AFDC) (29% vs. 16%; OR = 0.477 [95% CI: 0.29–0.80], P = 0.005; Table 3 ) decreased the odds of being in a cluster.
Another study found between-group differences that were borderline significant in positive urgency between gambling disorder ( n = 31) and bipolar disorder ( n = 19, p =.05; [ 62 ]; Individuals with gambling disorder endorsed lower levels of positive urgency than individuals with bipolar disorder.
When comparing the AUCs of MELD-Na and the ML model, we observed a statistically borderline significant difference ( p = 0.05).
Sitting time shows a borderline significant positive association with anxiety in younger adults (adjusted β = 0.14, p = 0.050), suggesting that sedentary behavior may disproportionately affect the mental health of younger individuals, possibly due to higher stress levels or reduced opportunities for physical engagement during prolonged sitting periods.
Metastasis status also showed a borderline significant association with NLR levels (p = 0.050), with a higher proportion of metastatic cases observed in the high NLR group.
A borderline significant difference in age was observed among the groups ( p = 0.05), with post-hoc analysis revealing that patients in the Myopi-X lenses group were significantly younger than those in the single vision lenses group ( p = 0.01) and the atropine 0.01% group ( p = 0.004).
In that study the risk was borderline significant for skin melanomas among BRCA2 carriers (6 observed, 2.3 expected); p = 0.05).
116.7, p = 0.002, Cohen's d = 0.84, CI: 0.31, 1.36); and emotional well‐being, which is borderline significant (mean = 17.8 vs. 15.5, p = 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.5, CI: −0.01, 1.0).