“borderline significant”

There was a borderline significant relationship between higher levels of donor INS ‐cfDNA and lower islet yield [−0.38 (0.18), p = .050] (Table 2 ).

Improved survival was borderline significant in cases with a KPS ≥ 80 ( p = 0.05).

Although there was a tendency for Lactobacillus populations to increase after chitosan supplementation, the mean change in the amount of this microbial agent in the chitosan versus placebo group was estimated as borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

The four-way interaction was borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

Antimalarials were administered to 11 patients (58%), 73% of whom died during hospitalisation, yielding a borderline significant positive association between antimalarial administration and fatal outcome (OR 5.93, 95%CI: 0.93–50.5, Fisher's exact p-value = 0.05).

Because we observed significant or borderline significant interactions between total protein intake and sex on BF% ( p = 0.05), insulin ( p = 0.01), C-peptide ( p = 0.03), HDL-C ( p = 0.08), triglycerides ( p < 0.01), and the cardiometabolic score ( p = 0.07), we also performed all analyses in boy and girls separately (Table 2 ).

A borderline significant association towards higher risk of shorter disease-free survival of the patients with lower expression of RRM2 was apparent ( p = 0.050, Additional file 1 : Figure S8).

When all inflammation markers, significantly associated with breast cancer, were included together in the same model (model I) the risk estimates remained similar (i.e., the effects seemed to be independent of each other), but the association was only borderline significant for IL-1β (p = 0.05).

However, adding the US thyroid parenchymal score to model A (to create model B) yielded a borderline significant cNRI of 0.20 (95% CI, 0 to 0.39; P=0.05) and a significant IDI of 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.02; P=0.04).

At 12 months, there was a borderline significant increase in fT4 levels compared to baseline (p=0.05), but values remained within normal limits (0.8–1.8 ng/dL).

There was a borderline significant four-way interaction between retention period, presence of irrelevant information, colour congruence and spatial congruence ( F (1,79) = 3.959, p = .05).

A borderline significant negative association with rheumatologic diseases was also observed (aOR 0.77 [95% CI 0.59–1.00]; p = 0.05).

After further adjustment for age, only a smaller putamen volume fraction remained borderline significant with an OR of 0.699 ([95% CI 0.481, 0.987], p = 0.050). 3.3.

Gender shows a borderline significant association, with females having lower odds compared with males (odds ratios [OR] = 0.64, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.41–1.00, P = .05).

After parental time with the child was added to model 2, its overall explanatory power had been increased to 2.2% ( p > 0.05), parental time with the child had a borderline significant impact on PCDI- comprehension ( β = 0.094, p = 0.05).

For gestation, there was a borderline significant inverse trend in breast cancer risk overall ( p = 0.05), which was significant pre-menopausally ( p = 0.03), with the greatest risk for those who had given birth at 26–32 weeks (HR = 2.38, 95% CI 1.26–4.49).

Sex-specific linear regression analyses, while not reaching significance level of 0.05, indicated that the associations between As exposures and Alu, LINE-1 and LUMA were positive among male newborns (N = 58) but negative among female newborns (N = 43); tests for sex differences were borderline significant for the association of cbAs and mbAs with Alu (p = 0.05 and 0.09, respectively) and for the association between maternal uAs and LINE-1 (p = 0.07).

This difference between the experimental and the control group was borderline significant (OR 3.54, P = 0.05, 95% CI 0.97–12.59), indicating that implementation intentions might have had a positive effect on the number of participants with vitamin D at home. 3.4.

However, catecholamine status at the ET was borderline significant for OS ( P = .05; Fig 3 J).

FICB demonstrated a borderline significant increase in the risk of quadriceps weakness (RR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.02 to 10.37, P = 0.05).

Subgroup differences for glucose iAUC were borderline significant ( p = 0.05). 3.5.7.

Chi-squared analysis revealed a borderline significant difference in the proportion of females medicated (71.4%) compared to males (43.8%) (Χ 2 (1) = 3.92, p = .05).

The cost contribution attribute was again not significant for the parent sample but was borderline significant for the child sample, who showed preference for lower cost contribution ( β -coefficient = −0.0095 [ P = 0.050; 95 % bootstrapped CI = −0.013 to −0.009]).

The Cd levels of blood was borderline significant (p = 0.05) higher in the buffer of 1500 m.

A clinical diagnosis of sepsis with unspecified focus of infection was a borderline significant risk factor for enterococcal infection in univariate analysis (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.00-4.00, p = 0.050) and a significant risk factor in multivariate analysis (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.36-6.20, p = 0.006).