“borderline significant”

However, we observed a borderline significant interaction ( p = 0.05) between BMI and T2D on cancer mortality.

However, when patients were stratified according to genetic testing positivity, those with any of the studied mutations did not show any correlation between LDL-C and other variables, while for those without a mutation, there was a moderate, statistically significant correlation between LDL-C and the clinical point score (R = 0.554, p = 0.01), as well as a borderline significant, moderate correlation between LDL-C and body fat (R = 0.441, p = 0.05).

Meta-analysis of this outcome indicated a borderline significant association between increased risk of treatment discontinuation and the weekly schedule (RR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.00 – 2.32, p = 0.05).

However, only a borderline significant association was observed between very preterm neonates and controls (adjusted OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.03–3.19; P = 0.050).

Univariate analysis demonstrated a borderline significant decline in the odds of men testing positive for anal gonorrhea from one year to the previous year (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.00; p = 0.05) but not for pharyngeal gonorrhea (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.91-1.07; p = 0.77) (Table 3 ).

After adjustment for sex, BSA remained a significant correlate of LVEDID, LVEDL and LVEDV (p<0.01 for all), and also remained a borderline significant correlate of LV mass (p<0.05), but was no longer a correlate of LV end-diastolic external diameter.

Chi-squared analysis revealed a borderline significant difference in the proportion of females medicated (71.4%) compared to males (43.8%) (Χ 2 (1) = 3.92, p = .05).

Body weight: There was a borderline significant difference in BW‐kg change between study arms ( P = 0.05).

The Chinese GWAS 44 SNP rs1399634 was borderline significant ( p = 0.050), while the remaining variants did not replicate (Supplementary Table 5 ).

Moreover, the presence of chocolate ingredient had a borderline significant effect on AFB1 (p = 0.05) and a significant effect on OTA (p = 0.002), with higher percentages observed in SKUs containing chocolate.

Post hoc analysis revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma CXCL5 levels from baseline to 6-months (−440.86 pg/mL, 95% CI = −799.79 to −81.93, p = 0.05) in the waitlist control group ( Figure 2 d).

(2018) [ 19 ] in China reported a borderline significant association between lower annual household income and root caries in the 35–44-year-old age group (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–1.00, p = 0.05).

The difference in median score was borderline significant between CUBBITT and the reference text (p-value = 0.05), whereas it was statistically significant between CUBBITT and DeepL (p-value = 0.03), and between CUBBITT and Google Translate (p-value = 0.001).

Immediate graft function, higher in the stented group, became borderline significant ( P = 0.05).

There was a borderline significant relationship between perceived social support in the domain of significant others and OE ( P = 0.05).

However, there was borderline significant heterogeneity among included trials (Cochrane's Q, p = 0.05; I 2 = 74%).

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

Male patients also showed a borderline significant downregulation compared to the male controls (male EFC = 0.698, p = 0.05; female EFC = 0.570, p = 0.015).

Composition variation was also found among the HA subgroups (HA-1, HA-2, and HA-3), which was also not significant (all p > 0.05), with exceptions for Bacteroides uniformis and Mediterraneibacter gravus , which were borderline significant between HA-2 and HA-3 and between AD and HA-3 (both p = 0.05), respectively ( Figure 1 and Figure 2 ).

There was a borderline significant difference in p[Na] following the intervention from baseline to visit 6 for the intervention group (p = 0.050).

The presence of headaches was borderline significant with an OR of 0.04 (95% CI: 0.0006, 0.60; p = 0.05). 4.

A comparison of stimulation protocols showed a borderline significant difference regarding CPR ( p = 0.05).

Baseline IL-6 ( Table 4 , down) showed a borderline significant positive association with attention at baseline (TMT-A: β = 0.360, p = 0.050), which persisted as a trend at 5 years (β = 0.996, p = 0.052) and reached significance at 10 years (β = 0.568, p = 0.020).

In addition to the relationships described in Table 4 , there was a borderline significant ( P = 0.05) inverse relationship between serum sodium and fasting RMR (−87 ± 42 kcal/day for each mmol/L increase in serum sodium).

Calibration assessment using logistic regression showed borderline significant underprediction of the true probabilities of non-arterial sample type overall (intercept = 0.31, p = 0.05), with mild underconfidence in predictions (slope 1.24, p < 0.01).