“borderline significant”

There was a borderline significant four-way interaction between retention period, presence of irrelevant information, colour congruence and spatial congruence ( F (1,79) = 3.959, p = .05).

(2018) [ 19 ] in China reported a borderline significant association between lower annual household income and root caries in the 35–44-year-old age group (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–1.00, p = 0.05).

The group difference in ‘stds above the surrogate’ was borderline significant, t (44) = 1.99, p = 0.05, d = 0.60, with the IB group mean being slightly higher.

The results also showed a significant main effect of stimuli [ F (1, 39) = 80.92, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.68, S 1 > S 2 ] and of gender [ F (1, 39) = 5.14, p = 0.029, η 2 p = 0.12, larger for females than males] for the mean N 100 amplitudes and a borderline significant interaction of stimuli × gender [ F (1, 39) = 4.04, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.09] without treatment effect.

Briefly, we noted no significant relationship between the independent variable prednisone exposure, or varying doses of prednisone on the SBP Z ‐score but did note a borderline significant association with BMI ( P = .05).

The (CAG) 25+8 allele contracted at a frequency that is statistically significantly above background ( P = 0.006), while the (TAG) 25+8 contraction frequency compared to background is only borderline significant ( P = 0.05; entries 10I and J in Table 1 ).

The number of voxels representing high ΔSI (bolus) muscle values in infected rats, relative to corresponding controls at each time point, showed a steady decline as infection progressed (Linear regression analysis, borderline significant, P = 0.05).

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

Men treated with ICS showed a borderline significant reduction in the risk for severe exacerbation (P = 0.05) and had a lower frequency of symptoms than women (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.15–0.59; P < 0.001) [ 32 ].

The difference in proportions in reported findings from the CXRs between the two groups was borderline significant (p=0.05).

This difference was borderline significant (11 ± 2 versus 16 ± 2, p = 0.05) (Model 1, Table 2 and Figure 2 a).

However, comparison of peak concentrations with baseline showed a borderline significant ( p = 0.05) increase from baseline levels after the Neutr-meal, for which postprandial increases in IL-6 and IL-1β were also observed.

However, it is important to note that only three studies included in the analysis had high quality, which accounted for 19.01% of the weight of the aggregated meta-analysis results, and the findings in the moderate-quality studies were borderline significant ( p = 0.05).

Lower Vitamin D levels showed a borderline significant association with abnormal HRUS (p=0.050) and were strongly associated with higher SPADI-Disability scores (p=0.001).

Better performance was noted on the CE-SDCT with a borderline significant difference (P = 0.05) for senior radiology resident.

CD63 and SORL1 were significantly modulated in accordance with changes in the microarray assay, and CASP4 was borderline significant (p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Age-group was statistically significant ( p = 0.0004) in the model while sex was borderline significant ( p = 0.050).

After adjusting for the students’ age, gender, average parental refractive error, and time spent on near work and outdoor activity, those with a serious attitude for performing them (multiple β = 0.73, p = 0.043), and with a higher frequency of performing them seriously, still remained borderline significant (multiple β = 0.44, p = 0.050).

A respectively significant and borderline significant decrease in FM was observed in the I (−4.04%, P < 0.05) and C (−3.66%, P = 0.05) group.

Within each stimulus type, no significant difference in the mean amplitude of wave V across the test conditions was identified for ABR to click ( p >0.05) and the result for ABR to LS chirp was borderline significant ( p =0.05).

Compared with VKAs, the use of DOACs was associated with significantly reduced risks of stroke (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.70; p < 0.00001), ischemic stroke (RR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.78; p < 0.0001), stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.95; p = 0.01), myocardial infarction (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.55-0.88; p = 0.002), major bleeding (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90; p = 0.002), intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.44-0.56; p < 0.00001), and major gastrointestinal bleeding (RR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.95; p = 0.02), and a borderline significant decrease in major adverse cardiac events (RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.75-1.00; p = 0.05) in NVAF patients with diabetes.

Sitting time shows a borderline significant positive association with anxiety in younger adults (adjusted β = 0.14, p = 0.050), suggesting that sedentary behavior may disproportionately affect the mental health of younger individuals, possibly due to higher stress levels or reduced opportunities for physical engagement during prolonged sitting periods.

In this analysis, we found a borderline significant correlation between age and islet Cd levels in non-smokers (R 2 = 0.145, p = 0.050, n = 27, Fig. 2b ) but not in the relatively small cohort of smokers (n = 6).

The largest association was a borderline significant reduction in lower back pain with each hour reduction in prolonged sitting ( b = −0.39, 95% CI: −0.79, 0.00, p = 0.050).

Examining the RG and FG separately, the RG showed a significant 3.0-fold CK increase until week 3 ( p = 0.010), whereas the FG demonstrated only borderline significant changes by the factor 1.5 during the first week ( p = 0.05), peaking at 72 h after WB-EMS ( p = 0.048; r = 0.64).