“borderline significant”

At TP2, with less data available, we observed only a borderline significant difference with worse OS in patients with FCM-MRD ≥ 0.01% ( p = 0.050; Supplementary Figure 6 ).

The overall NMSS score was higher for women, although borderline significant (mean difference 4.41; range -0.02-8.85; p = 0.05), and with a high heterogeneity (I 2 = 69.7%) (Fig. 2A ).

(2018) [ 19 ] in China reported a borderline significant association between lower annual household income and root caries in the 35–44-year-old age group (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93–1.00, p = 0.05).

Problem-solving was borderline significant in the univariable analysis (OR = 1.83, p = 0.05) but did not remain significant in the multivariable model (AOR = 1.74, p = 0.20).

Post hoc analysis revealed a borderline significant decrease in plasma CXCL5 levels from baseline to 6-months (−440.86 pg/mL, 95% CI = −799.79 to −81.93, p = 0.05) in the waitlist control group ( Figure 2 d).

Baseline IL-6 ( Table 4 , down) showed a borderline significant positive association with attention at baseline (TMT-A: β = 0.360, p = 0.050), which persisted as a trend at 5 years (β = 0.996, p = 0.052) and reached significance at 10 years (β = 0.568, p = 0.020).

[ 19 ] were nuanced: they reported no significant difference using weighted UniFrac but observed a borderline significant separation ( p = 0.05) with the unweighted UniFrac metric.

Serine and free carnitine (C0) showed a borderline significant inverse association with endometrial cancer risk (OR 1SD : 0.89, 95% CI: 0.79–1.00, P-value =0.05, Perm-Pvalue = 1.00 and OR 1SD : 0.91, 95% CI: 0.81–1.00, P-value =0.07, Perm-Pvalue = 0.82, respectively).

BUN was borderline significant (β = 3.5, p = 0.05).

There was a slight increase in the odds of having ocular surface symptoms after adjusting for age and gender, but it was borderline significant (OR: 4.28, 95% CI, 0.93-19.58, p = 0.05) Of the 74 subjects identified as having symptoms of ocular surface disorders according to the OSDI score, only 16 were identified as abnormal by the Schirmer’s test.

Adenoviruses were detected in 24% (24/100) of samples, with a significant difference in positivity rate between the two DWTPs ( p < 0.0001 chi-square test), whereas 12% (12/100) of samples tested positive for Norovirus, with a borderline significant difference between locations ( p = 0.05).

nRCBV was not predictive of PFS at week 16 (p=0.09), but 2D-T1 response status was borderline significant (p= 0.05) ( Figure 4 ); however, PFS did not differ by 2D-T1 response status among the entire cohort of 2D-T1 non-progressors at week 16 (p=0.66, n=45), of which this small number of patients also with DSC-MRI data (n=7) was a subset.

There was a borderline significant difference between pre‐presentation and comparison intention to complete the test ( p = 0.05), with 66% intending to do so in the intervention group and 79% in the comparison group.

After excluding marital and employment statuses and living arrangement from the covariate list, the likelihood ratio test comparing models of covariates and vision (Covar + Vision) to covariates only (Covar Only) became borderline significant ( P = 0.05) for reading speed and was statistically significant ( P = 0.03) for balance.

The INS rs689 TT genotype appeared to affect progression from single to multiple autoAb positivity in HLA-DQ8 positive participants, although, this effect was only borderline significant ( P = 0.050), and it was not observed for INS rs1004446.

For the H2OPal and the Thermos bottles, there was a borderline significant difference (p < 0.05) using the Welsh test for unequal variance.

There was, however, a borderline significant difference ( P = .05) for higher daily sugar-sweetened beverage consumption for the PI group (32.3%) compared with the EI group (22.4%) ( Table 1 ).

This result was borderline significant ( p = 0.05), and therefore should be interpreted with caution, as it may reflect a trend rather than a definitive difference.

pylori antibodies was significantly higher in the group of patients with colorectal cancer than the healthy controls; however, the difference was only borderline significant ( P =0.05).

Examining the RG and FG separately, the RG showed a significant 3.0-fold CK increase until week 3 ( p = 0.010), whereas the FG demonstrated only borderline significant changes by the factor 1.5 during the first week ( p = 0.05), peaking at 72 h after WB-EMS ( p = 0.048; r = 0.64).

The results also showed a significant main effect of stimuli [ F (1, 39) = 80.92, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.68, S 1 > S 2 ] and of gender [ F (1, 39) = 5.14, p = 0.029, η 2 p = 0.12, larger for females than males] for the mean N 100 amplitudes and a borderline significant interaction of stimuli × gender [ F (1, 39) = 4.04, p = 0.05, η 2 p = 0.09] without treatment effect.

Borderline significant relationships were identified between Outcome and Educational Attainment ( p = 0.05) and Assesses Abilities and Limitations ( p = 0.06).

Acute lower respiratory symptoms were associated with lower CCL17 [estimate: 0.6 pg/ml, (95% CI: 0.5–0.8), p < 0.001] and a borderline significant lower level of CCL20 [estimate: 0.5 pg/ml (95% CI: 0.2–1.0), p = 0.05] ( Table 4 ).

We observed a borderline significant increased risk for kidney disease (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.49, P = 0.05).

A borderline significant ( p = 0.05) finding was that Medicaid patients had poorer overall survival compared to uninsured patients (HR = 1.14, p = 0.05).