“borderline significant”

Post-transplant CR was borderline significant on univariate analysis for OS (HR 3.87; 95% CI 0.99–15.11; p=0.051) but was a significant factor for PFS (HR 5.06; 95% CI 1.95–13.15; p=0.001).

Notably, we observed a borderline significant effect modification by sex (interaction P = 0.051), with women showing a stronger inverse association (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99), while no significant association was found in men (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99–1.02).

However, the effects were rather modest, and the effect on gp130 in PBMC was only borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

However, the difference in OS duration between the TPLN (-) and TPLN (+) groups was only borderline significant, despite the longer duration in the former group (18.25 mo, 95%CI: 16.7-24.1 vs 15.30 mo, 95%CI: 11.90-28.30, P = 0.051; Figure 2D ).

the positive treatment effect slightly increased over time); however, it was only borderline significant ( P = 0.051, Appendix Figure 6, Supplementary Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/CTG/A365 ).

The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio shows a borderline significant association with sarcopenia risk when considering all patients (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98–1.10, p = 0.051).

In sex-stratified Cox models, the trajectory group × sex interaction was borderline significant (likelihood-ratio test χ2(2) = 5.97, P = 0.051), and the proportional hazards assumption was supported (global Schoenfeld test P = 0.91; Table S23).

There was a borderline significant reduction in retinopathy with more intensive BP lowering (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.66–1.00, p = 0.051) but substantial heterogeneity in the magnitude of the effect across the included studies ( I 2 = 65.5%, p = 0.033) ( Figure 4 ) mostly attributable to the ACCORD result.

This association remained significant even after adjusting for serum creatinine at baseline (aOR 23.003, 95% CI 1.121-471.776, P =0.042), macroalbuminuria at baseline (aOR 21.968, 95% CI 1.085-444.659, P =0.044), use of SGLT2 inhibitors (aOR 23.496, 95% CI 1.208-456.928, P =0.037), and use of statins (aOR 40.208, 95% CI 1.389-1164.178, P =0.031), but the association became borderline significant after adjusting for the use of antihypertensive agents (aOR 17.968, 95% CI 0.990-326.052, P =0.051).

Furthermore, the probability of reporting higher loneliness in January 2021 (T4) than in April 2020 (T0) was borderline significant ( p = .051).

Infants from mothers with a low MUAC during pregnancy had a 1.6 times (odds ratio 1.621, 95% CI [0.998, 2.636]) higher risk for being stunted during the first months of life, although this risk was borderline significant in the adjusted model (Table 4 , p = .051).

When considering percent changes in BMI, this difference was borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

Medicines and the commodities domain readiness was also higher in peripheral health centres but the difference to medical centres was borderline significant (31.5% vs 18.8%, p = 0.051).

We did, however, detect a robust effect of hypoxia in slices from P29+ males ( Figure 6D ; F 1,24.298 = 4.384, p = 0.047), a borderline significant main effect of drug treatment (F 1,24.298 = 4.199, p = 0.051), and a significant drug-by-hypoxia interaction (F 1,24.298 = 4.592, p = 0.042).

3.4 L1CAM affects prognosis through its effect on platinum resistance In multivariate survival analysis, adjusted for age, FIGO stage and tumour grade, L1CAM IHC showed a significant association with DSS (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.12‐3.66, P = .019) and a borderline significant effect on PFS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.00‐2.56, P = .051); these results confirm L1CAM as an independent adverse prognostic factor (Figure 3A‐C ).

Glutamate also showed a slight decrease in the hippocampus, which was borderline significant (p = 0.051).

During the follow-up, patients with post-traumatic stress disorder had persistently higher scores on the HADS total score up to the third evaluation and anxiety subscore up to the fourth evaluation (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.047 to 4.935, p < 0.05), with higher scores on sleep quality (worse sleep) (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.372 to 3.539, p < 0.03) at the first, third, and fourth evaluations, with lower scores on health-related quality of life at the first, second, and fourth evaluations (“ t ” test, t-values from 2.615 to 3.634, p < 0.02), and a borderline significant difference at the second evaluation (“ t ” test, t = 1.980, p = 0.051).

Maternal hypothyroidism as chronic disease showed borderline significant association with CDH development ( P = 0.051).

The results of the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) analysis of the controls were that rs2178575 deviated significantly from HWE equilibrium (χ 2 = 184.216, p < 0.0001), rs1351592 had borderline significant deviation from HWE equilibrium (χ 2 =3.797, p = 0.051), and rs1799941 was in HWE equilibrium (χ 2 =0.497, p = 0.481). 3.4.

568.8 ± 171.9; p = 0.0008), the differences in levels of plasma IL-6 between CAPS and persistent sJIA were borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

The item “Yoga should be recommended as complementary therapy for managing lifestyle disorders” showed a borderline significant difference across batches (χ2 = 9.45, df = 4, p = 0.051), with a small effect size (ε2 = 0.0614).

CTCAE toxicity grade before O 3 T was inversely correlated with time-lapse between the end of radiotherapy and rectal bleeding (rho = −0.588, p = 0.044) and showed a trend towards a borderline significant direct correlation with O 3 T duration (rho = 0.574, p = 0.051) and number of rectal O 3 T sessions (rho = 0.648, p = 0.059); that is, higher toxicity grade was related to earlier commencement of RB and longer treatment with O 3 T.

Patients with malignancy had higher CRP levels, D-dimer, and TLC, as well as lower lymphocyte count, Hb, hematocrit, and CrCl (CrCl borderline significant, p = 0.051).

We found a borderline significant effect ( P = 0.051) for the lumbar spine BMD, but not for the femoral neck site.

Latencies The latency of the wave in ring 1 mfERG in the affected eye was statistically significantly longer than the control eye after three months ( p = 0.011), while in rings 3 and 4, borderline significant, or significantly longer, latencies were observed in the affected eye at the first examination (ring 3 p = 0.051; ring 4 p = 0.044), and in rings 2 and 5 there was no significant difference in latencies between the affected and control eyes throughout the observed examinations ( Figure 4 ).